|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Ports revival projects reach nowhere
By P. Venugopal
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, MAY 26. Revival of the minor ports is one
area where little has been achieved during the just-concluded
tenure of the LDF Government.
The previous UDF Government, towards the end of its term, had
taken a policy decision to encourage participation in the
development of the minor ports in the State. Though the policy
was pursued by the Nayanar Government also, the envisaged
programme did not reach the stage where the work on reviving
these ports could actually commence.
The only port where the matter had progressed beyond the
procedural stage was the one at Beypore. However, even in this
case, the work had to be stopped as soon as it began due to local
issues.
Five minor ports were identified for revival in 1995. The
selection was based on the potential the regions surrounding
these ports had for industrial growth in the context of the plans
to set up a chain of thermal power stations across the State.
Besides Beypore, near Kozhikode, the other minor ports identified
for revival were Vizhinjam in Thiruvananthapuram district,
Munambam in Ernakulam district, Thangasserry in Kollam district
and Azhikkal in Kannur district.
The first one to be blue-printed was the Vizhinjam Port and the
total cost of the project was then estimated to be in the region
of Rs. 3,000 crores. As per the blue-print, Vizhinjam was
perceived to be having the potential to be made a major container
transshipment terminal because of its strategic location close to
the international shipping route between the UK, West Asia and
the Far East.
Further, it has the advantage of having a natural depth of 16 to
20 metres within one nautical mile from the shore and very low
sedimentation in the surrounding seas, which are ideal factors
for a port.
The previous UDF Government had signed a memorandum of
understanding with the Kumar Energy Corporation for the
development of the Vizhinjam Port and the setting of a 400 MW
thermal power plant nearby. The Kumar Group then proceeded to
link up a technical collaboration agreement with the Pembinam
Radzai of Malaysia for the work on the port.
With Mr. A. K. Antony taking over as the Chief Minister from Mr.
K. Karunakaran in 1995, the UDF Government decided against
awarding such projects to private firms without competitive
bidding. This turned to be a dampener for the Kumar Group
initiative at that stage.
The LDF Government which came next took three years to get over
its indecision on the issue. Finally the proposal was cleared in
January 1999 by the State Cabinet, but, by then the Kumar Group's
interest in the thermal plant had waned due to the difficulty in
getting fuel linkage. By the end of the same year, the Government
and the company signed a build-operate-transfer (BOT) agreement
for the development of the port. However, things did not progress
after that.
The Beypore port near Kozhikode had also gone through the same
ordeal as the Vizhinjam port. The project included the
establishment of an LPG storage and bottling plant by the
promoter, Peevees Petroleum Products Ltd., in association with
the multinational Mobil of the US.
The company signed the BOT agreement in March 1998 and though the
work commenced soon enough, it came to a halt within months after
the company had spent about Rs. 20 crore. The reason being cited
is the stiff resistance put up by the local people who fear that
the LPG installations will be a threat to the environment.
In January last year, the Government entered into a 25-year BOT
agreement with Saurashtra Cements of Mumbai for the development
of Munambam port near Kochi. The project includes the setting up
of a cement clinker unit and the construction of a captive berth
for handling and forwarding of the product. The work, however, is
yet to start.
The Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. had been after the project for
reviving the Thangasserry Port for a pretty long time. But the
company developed cold feet immediately after its proposal was
cleared by the State Cabinet. It is yet to respond to the
Government's invitation to sign a BOT agreement.
The new uniform sales tax structure for the States appears to be
one reason for the slackening interest. The promoter companies
were expecting sales tax reliefs and concessions from the
Government to attract high volumes of business at the revived
ports. No longer can a State adopt such measures.
The Azhikkal Port was linked to the Kannur Power Project and it
was proposed to be developed by the promoters of that project.
However, with the initiatives now being taken to have a gas
pipeline from the proposed LNG terminal at Puthuvypeen to
Mangalore, the viability of this port has become doubtful. With
the execution of the gas pipeline, there will be no need for
importing naphtha for the power project.
The new UDF Government will have to look into the factors
impeding the development of minor ports case by case and prepare
a time-bound plan for completing the projects which are still
relevant. The question of how to surmount the issue of providing
incentives to boost the business at the revived ports in spite of
the State's commitments under the uniform sales tax regime will
have to be addressed intelligently.
Actually, it is not the problem of funds which is proving to be
the real bottleneck. The initiative expected from the Government
does not involve any financial outgo since the projects are
conceived under the BOT arrangement.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Karunakaran men bag major portfolios Next : UDF sub-committee to revamp education | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|