|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, June 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Indonesia's democratic pangs
A NEW MOMENT of truth beckons a restive Indonesia in its emotive
quest for constitutional democracy. As a vast archipelago-state
already shattered economically in recent years, Indonesia now
faces an unprecedented test in its nervous experiments with
democratic rule of law. The Indonesian optimists tend to believe
that a critical mass of political resurgence is almost
imperceptibly taking shape, while the prophets of gloom point to
a spiralling crisis in basic governance itself. For those hoping
for a scheme of order that might follow the incremental chaos of
the present moment, a glimmer can be seen in the latest decision
by the agenda-managers of the People's Consultative Assembly to
discuss the impeachment of the beleaguered President, Mr.
Abdurrahman Wahid, on August 1. This constitutional activism has
been triggered by the collective will of the House of
Representatives. The House has recommended an impeachment hearing
in the context of the President's defiance in the face of two
censure motions that had been adopted concerning his alleged
complicity of some kind or other in two separate cases of
suspected corrupt deals. Given the inadequacy of Indonesia's
evolution as a resurgent democracy, the present political puzzle
in Jakarta cannot be easily explained with conceptual precision
or an exactitude of terminology. The law-makers are, on the
whole, engaged in a power struggle with a visually impaired Mr.
Wahid. Having proven himself inept at preserving the aura of
being a champion of democracy, Mr. Wahid is not only fighting an
essentially unequal battle for primary survival in office but
also threatening to inflict a mortal blow to the country's
fragile democracy itself. This marks a poignant irony as his
election as President in 1999 signalled the first democratic
event of its kind for over 40 years in a country which had in
fact begun its post-colonial era with conspicuous aspirations of
political pluralism.
Mr. Wahid's style as a paternalistic guru of Indonesia's
democratic renaissance has often put him on a collision course
with the legislators. Some of them see themselves as the
potential architects of a new democratic order. The point of
reference for this tussle is the political verdict of the people
in 1999, and not surprisingly, Ms. Megawati Sukarnoputri has so
far succeeded in casting herself as the leader deprived of her
legitimate popular mandate to govern Indonesia. Having agreed to
serve as Mr. Wahid's deputy following her defeat in the
presidential poll of 1999, Ms. Megawati will now succeed him if
he is finally voted out of office. As the Vice-President, she has
until very recently played by the rule-book and abided by the
President's political policies and directives. By doing so, Ms.
Megawati has certainly enhanced her political stock, although she
remains ill at ease in toeing the line of a person who had
outsmarted her without actually stealing the presidential
election from her.
Indonesia's titanic struggle for a sense of direction, let alone
a democratic order or an economic revival, is of considerable
importance to the larger international community in the present
context of changing power equations. As a populous country, which
now is at risk of losing the battle for democracy, Indonesia has
often been shaped in the past by its military forces. The
peculiarities of its political evolution, punctuated by Sukarno's
energetic but erratic rule and by Gen. Suharto's
authoritarianism, account for this. It is, therefore, a matter of
some importance at this stage that the military leaders are
generally believed to have refused to collaborate with Mr. Wahid
in his uncharacteristic effort to try and consolidate his hold on
power. They may have actually advised him against proclaiming an
emergency with martial law as its core. The current mood of the
military establishment, which has yet to recover fully from its
own shocks of recent years, cannot yet be taken as the defining
reality.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Soundings on the Tenth Plan Next : Ayodhya 2001 | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|