|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
Moscow asks Delhi to prove its NMD stand
By Vladimir Radyuhin
MOSCOW, JUNE 2. Even though Mr. Jaswant Singh is coming to Russia
on Sunday primarily in his capacity of Defence Minister to co-
chair the first session of the Indo-Russian Commission on
Military-Technical cooperation, Moscow is looking forward to
having important discussions with him in his other capacity as
External Affairs Minister on global security in the context the
U.S. intention to build a National Missile Defence (NMD).
India's positive reaction to the U.S. plan came as a shock to
Moscow, which had ranked New Delhi among its allies in opposing
the NMD. The Russian Foreign Minister, Mr. Igor Ivanov - who
happened to be in Delhi a day after the Ministry issued its
statement on Mr. George Bush's speech on NMD - could not think of
anything better than deny any differences in the Russian and
Indian positions on the issue.
Now Moscow is ready for more substantive talks. On the eve of Mr.
Singh's arrival in Moscow, Mr. Ivanov suggested engaging India in
the unfolding consultations with the U.S. on global security.
``We must conduct a dialogue with the U.S., China and India to
find a common response to the new threats in the 21st century,''
Mr. Ivanov was quoted as saying in Minsk, Belarus, where he went
for a summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States. ``We
should neutralise these threats, but not at the cost of security
and international stability.'' By inviting New Delhi to sit at
the table with nuclear powers Moscow implicitly recognises
India's nuclear status. It is an invitation Mr. Singh can hardly
refuse. But it also a challenge to New Delhi to defend its view
that the NMD may be a good thing.
As a matter of fact Moscow is telling New Delhi: You say NMD can
make the world safer; fine, come and show us how it can be made.
It is one thing to hail Mr. Bush's plan as renunciation of the
Cold War nuclear deterrence through a ``balance of terror'' but
it is something very different to try and build a new security
arrangement on its basis without provoking a new arms race.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Clinton takes credit for Kargil withdrawal | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|