|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, June 04, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Row over security cover for Hasina
By Haroon Habib
DHAKA, JUNE 3. The Bangladesh Jatiya Sangsad, which meets on June
6 in its last session, is likely to enact a new law for providing
security to Sheikh Hasina, who is going to complete her five-year
tenure as Prime Minister, marking a landmark in the country's
parliamentary history.
The current Parliament, which will complete its term on July 13,
is the first one to do so in Bangladesh's 30-year history. The
previous Houses could not complete their terms either due to
military interventions or anti-Government agitations.
The issue of Sheikh Hasina's security, after she steps down from
the office, has started causing serious concern among the Awami
League's policy planners. A party delegation met the President,
Mr. Justice Shahabuddin Ahmed, and explained to him the different
aspects of the planned legislation to provide security to Sheikh
Hasina and her sister, Sheikh Rehena, the two surviving daughters
of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who led the nation to freedom from
Pakistan. The assassins of Mujib, many of whom are at large, were
sentenced to death by the High Court recently.
While the security threats to Hasina and her family members are
real, particularly ahead of the crucial election and in view of
the risks they face now after the conviction of Mujib's killers,
the issue was taken up by the mainstream Opposition politically.
A delegation of the main Opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party
(BNP) met the President on May 28 and requested him not to give
assent to the proposed Bill.
The Opposition has alleged that after passing the law to ensure
state security to Sheikh Hasina, she would continue to live in
``Ganobhaban'', her official residence, and this would have a
psychological impact on the voters in the coming election. They
also complained to the President that in the name of state
security, Sheikh Hasina would continue to enjoy state protocol.
A high profile delegation of the ruling party, while informing
the President of their firm stand on ``no compromise on the
security issue of Hasina'', criticised the Opposition for
``misinterpretation and falsehood''. They said the Opposition
leader and the former Prime Minister, Begum Khaleda Zia, had been
continuously enjoying all such facilities, since the
assassination of her husband, Gen. Ziaur Rahman, in 1981. The
Awami League delegation consisting of senior Ministers, expressed
grave concern over threats to Sheikh Hasina's life. In such a
situation, they observed, providing special security to Hasina
was the prime responsibility of the state. ``We are now more
concerned about her security after the High Court verdict
sentencing the killers of the Father of the Nation'', the Finance
Minister, Mr. S.A.M.S. Kibria, told reporters after coming out of
Bangabhaban, the President's house.
The ruling party leaders pointed out that such security measures
were ensured for former Prime Ministers and Presidents and their
family in many countries, including India and Sri Lanka. Even
Begum Khaleda Zia and her children have been enjoying all
facilities including housing, cars, allowances and maintenance
cost of her two houses - one in the Dhaka cantonment and other in
the posh Gulshan residential area - for more than 20 years.
Despite being the daughters of the country's independence leader,
Sheikh Hasina and her sister had refused facilities offered by
the past military Governments.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : EPDP cashes in on demand for computer education Next : Pak. Chief Justice reminds Govt. of deadline | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|