|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, June 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Portrayal of violence
ON MEDIA VIOLENCE: W. James Potter; Sage Publications India Pvt.
Ltd., M32 Market, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi-110048. $29.95.
THE PORTRAYAL of violence in mass media, particularly television
programmes, has of late become a cause for concern in our
country.Violence in the American society has come to be viewed as
a public health problem for which, besides many apparent factors
such as poverty, breakdown of the nuclear family and fall in
traditional values, the mass media is regarded as a major cause.
One may argue that the media only depicts what is happening in
real life. But the truth, as pointed out in the introductory
chapter of the book under review, is that the media amplify and
reconfigure the violence in real life and use violence as a
staple in telling fictional stories to entertain the viewers. The
continuous pumping in of these messages has a range of negative
effects on society. This is indicated by the increase in crime
rate and the fear psychosis among teenagers in the U.S., which
has earned the dubious distinction of being the world leader in
the prevalence of violence on television.
The author is a well-known name in the area of mass communication
and had been one of the principal investigators on the national
television violence study.
He begins by presenting a review of the findings of the research
on media violence conducted so far, which has provided a solid
knowledge base. He then focusses on the conceptual limitations of
these research studies brought out by the disagreement among the
scholars on certain key issues. These include the very definition
of violence in media portrayals and the questions as to what
factors lead to various effects and what constitutes an effect
from exposure to media violence. This leads him to propose a
rethinking not only on many of the prevailing ideas and concepts
but also on the methodology of the studies. Based on these he
propounds a lineation perspective, which he describes as a blend
of explanations and speculations, the former highlighting what is
known already and the latter providing directions for what needs
to be known. In short, the lineation theory seeks to be
inclusive, trying to avoid excluding any key ideas on media
violence.
In conclusion, he calls for a shift to a new perspective on media
violence thinking and research. He does not recommend a paradigm
shift but wants the researchers to build on the foundation of the
research so far conducted and focus on new questions as well as a
deeper analysis of the older questions.
How can television programmes provide us with useful warning
about the risk of the content in their narratives? Can exposure
to some violence have positive effects and if so what are those
positive outcomes and how can we increase their prevalence? What
strategies can we use to protect children from negative effects
of exposure to violence? Do risks of exposure continue even when
someone has reached adulthood and if so, what strategies can they
adopt to protect themselves from negative effects? He seeks to
address these questions in this volume.
In his view, the second phase of research should address the
following questions: what percentage of children will exhibit a
disinhibition effect after being exposed to media violence
portrayed in a particular web of context? What degree of
sensitisation is there to victims in the general population of
television viewers?
Within the contextual web of violent portrayals, what is the
strength of justification, relative to other elements in the web?
The focus should be on assessing how much of the processes and
effects operate in the aggregate and how much is traceable to
differences in interpretations among individuals.
In India the problem of media violence may not be of the same
magnitude as in the U.S. But it has of late begun to be felt with
the small screen aping the full-length films in showing scenes of
violence and torture. In this context this book will be of
relevance. Though written in the U.S. setting, it can be a useful
resource material for Indian social scientists in their study of
the emerging situation in India and recommending suitable
remedial measures.
B. S. PADMANABHAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Fundamentalism, a global menace? Next : Enquiry committees and commissions | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|