|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, June 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Ganguly redeems himself in style as India scampers home
By Vijay Lokapally
BULAWAYO, JUNE 27. The good news in the Indian camp, as much as
the victory, was Sourav Ganguly scoring a few runs. The entire
team crowded the balcony to applaud the skipper as he finally
smiled with the bat in his hands.
The skipper, aided by deputy Rahul Dravid, piloted India into the
final of the triangular series with the team winning its second
successive match by four wickets in a last- over finish.
The Indian victory, however, had its moments of anxiety as left-
arm spinner Grant Flower picked four wickets in the span of 19
balls to create panic in the opponent camp. What looked a one-
sided finish became a thriller, the first one of the series,
thanks to the inconsistent Indian middle-order. But Dravid kept
his composure and carried the team to a win, cracking the winning
hit to leave his mark. The `Man of the match' honour befitted his
sensible, matchwinning innings.
If Zimbabwe gave itself a chance to win it was justified. An
unusually subdued Sachin Tendulkar had departed cheaply and an
over-enthusiastic Dinesh Mongia had perished to an ill-directed
drive. Despite the batting strength, India was not comfortably
placed to direct its chase, what with Ganguly, at that point,
still battling to regain his form.
The innings should go a long way in making Ganguly believe that
his dismal show with the bat for a long time now was just a
passing phase. The new hair-style seemed to have done wonders to
Ganguly's fortune and confidence. He was not anxious to get on
top of the bowling and was willing to wait for his time to
dominate. It came his way much earlier than he would have
imagined and the strokes flowed so smoothly. It was not one of
Ganguly's best performance at the crease but it was immensely
valuable in terms of restoring his image as a strokeplayer and
his position as a captain. The recent run of poor scores had put
him under severe pressure. This innings should transform his
attitude in the remaining matches of the tour.
The Zimbabwean bowling failed to back the good work of the
batsmen and was quickly sorted out by Ganguly and Dravid, the
latter playing a gem of an innings. Mongia had looked good in his
innings which did have a few edged shots but it was enough to put
off the early alarms.
Decisive partnership
The 93-run stand between Ganguly and Dravid decided the course of
the match. Ganguly was very elegant in his strokeplay and cracked
a few robust strokes, included a six off Whittall. He looked set
for his 17th One-day hundred when his big have was held
stunningly by a tumbling Alistair Campbell at midwicket boundary.
Dravid matched his captain in producing a committed innings and
was a treat to watch for his frontfoot play, especially the
drives which carried the stamp of class. It was also a
responsible essay as he anchored the chase with his sensible
batsmanship.
A middle-order collapse created panic in the Indian camp when
Hemang Badani yorked himself and Virender Sehwag played a silly
swipe. It was a difficult stage for India when Sameer Dighe
played a poor sweep but Dravid, bringing his experience into
play, finished the job with support from Agarkar.
Zimbabwe took the field without Heath Streak, who pulled out
because of an abdomen muscle strain, and the home team had its
third captain - Guy Whittall - in three matches of this series.
It was good toss that Ganguly won as it allowed India first use
of a moist pitch which necessitated a 15-minute delay in the
start.
Fine knock by Whittall
The Zimbabwean innings revolved around Whittall, who may have
begun slowly but recovered well enough to pace the innings to a
nicety and show the others the way to scatter the field with some
well-placed strokes. Off the last 11 overs, Zimbabwe plundered 96
runs and made a match of it only because of this brilliant
fightback initiated by Whittall and Grant Flower.
The Indians failed to credit themselves in the bowling
department. The disciplined line of the last match at Harare was
missing as the bowlers overstepped and sprayed the ball on either
side. There was a minor concern for the Indians in the first hour
itself when Ashish Nehra was warned by umpire Ahmed East for
running on to the danger area. There were worries for India in
fielding too. It was tardy at times.
Zimbabwe did well to recover from seven for two. Alistair
Campbell was foxed by a ball which stopped and Stuart Carlisle
was hit plumb. Zimbabwe owed a lot to Whittall even though the
spadework was done by Craig Wishart and Dion Ebrahim, the latter
batting most laboriously. The Zimbabwean innings was nurtured by
Wishart, Ebrahim, Whittall and Grant Flower in phases and helped
to its destination by some wayward performance by the Indians.
Ebrahim is a batsman with limitations and his strength lies in
his knowing his strong and weak points. He was let off once each
by Agarkar and Mongia and earned the benefit once from umpire
Jeff Fenwick but he carried on. At the other end, Wishart gained
by working the ball square to help himself to some valuable runs.
His innings was crucial to his side.
The Wishart-Ebrahim stand was broken by Ganguly, who induced a
false shot with clever change of pace. Ebrahim meanwhile hung on
with Grant Flower and was finally got rid off by Zaheer who
landed the ball on his foot.
The Grant Flower-Whittall stand that followed was the best phase
of the day for Zimbabwe. From a precarious 122 for four the home
team recovered to a decent total and all credit to this pair,
which gained because it adopted positive methods.
It was an ideal track for Grant Flower who loves to graft and it
suited Whittall too, as he launched a blistering assault on
Agarkar, who conceded 14 runs off the last over. His second spell
of four overs went for 37 runs. Whittall played a series of
powerful drives and a couple of reverse-sweeps, off Harbhajan, in
his lively innings. It was fitting that he remained unbeaten and
signed off in style, slamming the last ball of the innings for a
sizzling boundary.
ZIMBABWE
D. Ebrahim lbw b Zaheer 42
(110b, 4x4)
A. Campbell c Ganguly b Zaheer 2
(5b)
S. Carlisle lbw b Zaheer 0
(5b)
C. Wishart c Agarkar b Ganguly 46
(68b, 3x4)
G. Flower c Sehwag b Zaheer 45
(54b, 4x4)
G. Whittall (not out) 58
(54b, 7x4)
A. Blignaut c Harbhajan b Agarkar 11
(9b, 2x4)
T. Taibu (not out) 2
(6b)
Extras (lb-7, nb-12, w-9) 28
---
Total (for six wkts in 50 overs) 234
---
Fall of wickets: 1-5 (Campbell), 2-7 (Carlisle), 3-94 (Wishart),
4-122 (Ebrahim), 5-184 (G. Flower), 6-215 (Blignaut).
India bowling: Ashish Nehra 10-0-31-0 (nb-3, w-2), Zaheer Khan
10-0-42-4 (nb-7, w-4), Ajit Agarkar 10-0-55-1 (nb-1, w-2),
Harbhajan Singh 9-0-42-0, Ganguly 7-0-38-1, Virender Sehwag 4-0-
19-0 (nb-1, w-1).
INDIA
S. Ganguly c Campbell b G. Flower 85
(125b, 8x4, 1x6)
S. Tendulkar c G. Flower b Strang 9
(27b)
D. Mongia c Whittall b Mutendera 37
(47b, 5x4)
R. Dravid (not out) 72
(64b, 7x4)
H. Badani b G. Flower 0
(1b)
V. Sehwag c Ebrahim b G. Flower 2
(8b)
S. Dighe c and b G. Flower 9
(13b, 1x4)
A. Agarkar (not out) 13
(12b, 1x4)
Extras (lb-1, nb-2, w-7) 10
---
Total (for six wkts in 49.2 overs) 237
---
Fall of wickets: 1-22 (Tendulkar), 2-91 (Mongia), 3-184
(Ganguly), 4-187 (Badani), 5-193 (Sehwag), 6-210 (Dighe).
Zimbabwe bowling: Andy Blignaut 10-0-41-0 (w-3), Bryan Strang 10-
2-26-1 (nb-1), David Mutendera 8.2-0-52-1 (w-2), Travis Friend 9-
0-45-0 (nb-1, w-2), Guy Whittall 4-0-28-0, Grant Flower 8-0-44-4.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Live audio coverage on Cricinfo.com Next : India makes a heavy weather of it | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|