|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Spouse defends Archer at trial
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, JUNE 30. The real drama in town is not at the West End
where a decent ticket even in the most decrepit of theatres costs
upwards of £ 30, but at the Old Bailey where admission is
free. The piece de resistance, now in its third week, is the
trial of the novelist-turned-politician, Lord Jeffrey Archer, who
is accused of telling lies to win a £ -500,000 libel suit
which he brought against a tabloid 14 years ago for alleging that
he had had a one-night stand with a prostitute.
Since the trial opened early this month, it has been the most
riveting media event holding on to the front page despite
competition from weightier matters of state and politics. Lord
Archer's private life has been turned inside out by his own
confidants who have told the court about his extra-marital
affairs, the generous gifts he bought for his ladies, the games
he played to ``cheat'' on his wife, the ``completely separate''
lives the couple led, and the diaries he allegedly got his
secretary, Ms. Angela Peppiatt, to ``forge'' to support his
alibi.
He has been even accused of keeping much of the £ 500,000
damages instead of donating them to the charities as he had
promised when he won the suit against Daily Star in 1987.
If style was ever the man, Lord Archer showed he had it in
abundance. And when, after over two weeks of merciless expose of
the most intimate details of his life, it was his turn to take
the stand, he declined on the ground that it would turn the focus
away from evidence. This, despite the risk that his silence might
be construed as an admission of guilt. The judge in fact warned
his counsel that in the circumstances the jury could draw ``any
inference they see proper'' from Lord Archer's decision to remain
silent.
This was on June 27, and with no more revelations expected, the
interest in the trial looked like starting to flag. But with an
Archer script you can never be too sure, surprises being always a
part of the deal. And, so, two days later, the trial was back on
its feet, crackling with life. For, none other than Lady (Mary)
Archer was in the stand replaying a role which, 14 years ago, had
earned her the reputation of the lady with a ``fragrance''. In a
bravura performance, which made her the toast of every newsroom
in town with The Times this morning leading with the story, this
Cambridge academic better known as Dr. Mary Archer, confounded
the audience with her demonstration of loyalty to a man who in
recent weeks was so publicly shown to have betrayed her - not
once, but repeatedly.
She stood by her husband, as she had all those years ago when she
testified for him in the libel case. ``It's complete and utter
nonsense'', was her contemptuous retort, when asked if it was
true as alleged by Lord Archer's secretary that they led
``completely separate lives''. And what about his former mistress
Ms Andrina Colquhoun? Did she know about their affair? ``I did.''
And did she confront him with it? ``Yes.'' Not satisfied, the
counsel asked: ``When you say you confronted him about it, was it
in the form of an ultimatum?'' Lady Archer, with what one
newspaper described as ``icy grammatical precision'', said: ``I
tend not to issue ultimata. Let's say that it was a full and
frank discussion.''
For a woman who is seen to have been at the wrong end of her
husband's alleged misdemeanours, Lady Archer was astonishingly
loyal as she contradicted all that had been said against him by
previous witnesses. And when it came to the jewellery he was
alleged to have bought for his women friends, she brought it all
out of a pouch and said they were meant for her - except for one
item which he had given to a ``lady who did indeed loomed large
in his life.'' And the lady, she said after a dramatic pause, was
``Margaret Thatcher on the tenth anniversary of her
premiership.''
``Steely'', ``imperious'', ``haughty, `` controlled'' were some
of the adjectives employed by newspapers today to describe Dr.
Archer who, when asked about her husband's peccadilloes, wondered
what all the fuss was about. ``He's hardly the first aspiring
politician to have had the odd fling'', she said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Afghan leader to visit Russia for aid talks Next : Sri Lanka begins air raids in north | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|