|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, July 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Security of investment
Sir, - This refers to the aftermath of the collapse of the US-64
scheme of the Unit Trust of India. Several statements are being
made by the Finance Minister, party leaders and financial
analysts regarding revamping of the scheme and taking care of the
small/retail investors.
Several points arise here that need to be considered in depth.
There are many retirees/senior citizens who had invested their
entire superannuation benefits in the scheme.
This category of investors are not interested in any speculative
transactions or business. Their only concern would be a
reasonable return on their investment and the security of their
invested amount. All these unit holders had purchased the units @
Rs.13.5-14.0/Unit,(ie) much higher than the actual NAV. It is
this category of investors that the UTI should address and not
debate on the basis of small or retail investors.
It appears that the actual NAV might fall to around Rs.9.0-10.0.
This category of investors (most of them) would accept a
guaranteed return reasonable enough compared to the nationalised
bank interest rates with the security of the capital assured.
Most of them would be prepared to accept also a lock-in period.
Scapegoats would be searched for in the coming days. But the
middle class unit holder is only interested in the security of
his/her invested amount and a healthy balance sheet of the
scheme.
M. Nagarajan,
Chennai
Sir, - The Investors Grievances Forum (IGF) seems to be on a
`restructuring' spree.
In the Madhavpura Bank case it was Mr. Kirit Somaiya, BJP MP and
president of IGF who spearheaded
the political move to `revive' the scam-tainted bank by pumping
in more than Rs. 1200 crores by way of deposits from other co-
operative banks in Ahmedabad and the RBI doling out approximately
Rs. 487 crores by way of guarantee amount under DICGC.
But has anyone looked into the repercussions it would have on
cooperative banking sector in the country? In the case of the
UTI, restructuring by giving Central Government and State
Government guarantee for the infusion of fresh funds will not do.
The remedy lies in removing the shortcomings in UTI's working and
bringing it on a par with other mutual funds in the country under
the umbrella of SEBI.
Satish Murdeshwar,
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Protecting judges | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|