|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, July 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
'Sivaji' V.C. Ganesan, 1927-2001
VILLUPURAM CHINNIAH GANESAN portrayed a vast canvas of emotions
on the silver screen. By bringing to life several historical and
fictional characters that were assigned to him during the past
five decades, `Sivaji' Ganesan has left behind a huge and
enduring legacy for generations of actors and film directors to
come. In his transition from theatre to the celluloid world,
Ganesan retained the essence of what drives many a performer -
the urge to satisfy his audience. That he did so with elan and
brought out the nuances expected of a role has ensured him a
place in Indian cinema. His portrayals of freedom fighters, which
included immortalising the Mahratta warrior-king, Chhatrapathi
Sivaji, bringing to life the Tamil rebel chieftan, Veerapandiya
Kattabomman and reliving the patriotic V. O. Chidambaram Pillai
on the silver screen, are testimony to his ability to impact his
audiences. As a professional film actor, Ganesan was a part of a
period that saw tremendous shifts in the performing arts in
India. The emergence of the silver screen and the decline of the
popular theatre is one. Yet another is the present day ease with
which individual shortfalls can be managed with technical
advances. In addition are the shifts in story plots from the
mythological to the commonplace and the romances.
If histrionics dominated over Ganesan on the silver screen, it is
no doubt a reflection of his origins in theatre. Even within the
five decades that Ganesan was part of the film industry, he
managed several transitions. His launch into the world of cinema
as well as his immediate claim to fame and success came in the
form of a role of an angry young man in 1952, which related to an
overwhelming desire of that period for social change. Rather than
remain trapped within the confines of a stereotype, Ganesan
shifted with ease to play several roles and bring out the essence
of the characters assigned to him. For the vast multitude that
thronged to the theatres to watch him in action, his purpose was
singular: to provide entertainment. That it came in several
forms, a considerable amount of them in the form of tear-jerkers
or loud delivery of dialogues, is more reflective of the times
and the receptiveness of the audiences, than the ability of the
actor himself. In addition to bringing to life freedom fighters
and mythological characters, Ganesan's portrayals of the several
commoners in a society - the upright police officer, the
romantic, the do- gooder, the village bumpkin, or even the ugly
man consumed by guilt, to mention but a few - made absorbing
viewing.
It was perhaps the professional actor in him, driven by the
passion to do his job well, that drew Ganesan away from creating
an image for himself and subsequently distanced his elusive
ambition: to emerge a success in politics as well. For, the
decades during which Ganesan emerged as an unparalleled performer
were also those when cinema gained space in the political agenda,
particularly in Tamil Nadu. Much of Ganesan's success and
performance would also have to be seen against the political and
social backdrop of Tamil Nadu. The transition of the Dravidian
movement from that of social reform to a political entity,
seeking to enter the portals of power, necessitated the spread of
its message to the vast millions. And, both theatre and cinema
were inherent parts of this effort at translating a political
ideology into a public agenda. It was also this moment in Tamil
Nadu's contemporary history that Ganesan and his talents came to
be a part of an important tool of propaganda: initially for the
Dravidian ideology and subsequently that of the Congress. That he
never won a national award for the best actor is bound to hurt
many, but the fact that, for years to come, actors aspiring to
enter Tamil movies will continue to be judged by their ability to
re-enact a small part of a role played by `Sivaji' will be a
lasting honour that few can lay claim to.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The challenge of militancy Next : The Agra syndrome | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|