|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Prakash Hinduja allowed to leave India
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 8. The Supreme Court today permitted Mr. Prakash
Hinduja, a Swiss national and accused in the Rs. 64-crore Bofors
payoff case along with his two brothers, to leave India.
A Bench comprising Mr. Justice M.B. Shah and Mr. Justice R.P.
Sethi granted the permission after Mr. P.P. Hinduja filed an
undertaking that he would forego his right of protection under
the Swiss laws in the event of any extradition proceeding being
instituted against him for his failure to return to India.
The apex court - which had on May 12 permitted Mr. S.P. Hinduja
and Mr. G.P. Hinduja, who are British nationals to leave India
and remain outside till August 20 - extended the operation of
that order till October 1.
The Bench, however, declined to permit the three brothers to
remain outside India at the same time, stating that at least one
of them should stay in India as surety to ensure the presence of
the other two to face the trial.
It asked Mr. S.P. Hinduja or Mr. G.P. Hinduja to make an
application before trial court as to who would be staying in
India.
The court directed Mr. P.P. Hinduja to execute a personal bond
for Rs. 15 crores and asked him to be present before the trial
court as and when required.
It also made it clear that the counsel for Mr. P.P. Hinduja shall
not take any adjournment of the trial on the ground of his
absence.
When Mr. Kapil Sibal, senior counsel for the Hindujas expressed
apprehension that the trial might not be completed within six
months as directed by the Delhi High Court, the Bench asked the
trial court to submit a report by August 30 detailing among other
things the time needed for the conclusion of trial.
The Bench noted that right from the beginning of the hearing, the
court had given enough concessions by granting them
bail and asked the counsel where was the necessity for thembeing
allowed to go abroad. Mr. Sibal submitted that the Hindujas had
global business and were required to attend important meetings
and even before charges were framed it had been presumed by
people in this country that they had been convicted in the case.
``This is causing a lot of damage to their reputation,'' he said,
adding that there was no apprehension of their absconding from
India.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : TDP for discussion on NCERT curriculum Next : Gujarat Minister speaks out against CM | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|