|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Miscellaneous
| Previous
| Next
dated August 9, 1951: Indian-Designed HT - 2 Plane
India's 10-year-old aircraft industry achieved a significant
milestone towards self-sufficiency with tests successfully done
on the first plane designed and built in Bangalore. Captain
Munshi, Chief Test Pilot, told TheHindu that it was easily
manoeuverable and responded quickly and effectively to controls.
``As soon as I took off, I felt great confidence. We did all
sorts of aerobatics, something unusual in the history of
prototype testing. The HT - 2 is an exceedingly promising
aircraft.'' Chief Inspector H. K. Karve added, ``The aircraft
made a perfect climb and zoomed over the airfield. It was flown
to 8,000 feet above sea level to check tendencies to stall etc.,
and performed very satisfactorily. The aircraft was subjected to
severe tests, including loops and tight turns, to which it
responded marvellously. After an hour, it came down and made a
perfect landing. Ground inspection showed that everything was
fine regarding structurally soundness. The designer of the
aircraft, Dr. Ghatage, said that the HT - 2 had been developed to
operate in tropical conditions and they had avoided the use of
fabric or wood. The engines and some instruments had to be
imported from outside. The idea of building HT - 2 was conceived
three years earlier. A top official of Hindustan Aircraft said
that the factory had programmed to manufacture 300 of the planes.
The engine used in the prototype was a Gypsy Major 10, but
production aircraft were to be fitted with Circus Major 3
engines.
Red Tape Disfranchisement of Women
Dr. James H. Cousins wrote from Madanapalle, ``Mrs. Margaret E.
Cousins, the pioneer for the enfranchisement of women in India,
and I are shocked that the central right of the parliamentary
vote is to be denied to 28 lakhs of women because they did not
give their personal names, and so had to be struck off the
electoral rolls. The insistence of these women on following the
long-established custom of naming themselves ``the wife or
daughter of so-and-so'' is thrown aside as a ``social
prejudice''. The duty of a Government is not to meet long-
established custom by departmental red tape, but to modify rules
and regulations to allow the intention of legislation to be
fulfilled.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Miscellaneous Previous : God redeems His devotees always Next : Weather | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|