|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Centre writes again on police officer's transfer
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, AUG. 13. The Union Home Ministry today once again
asked the Tamil Nadu Government to make available the services of
Mr. R. Rajagopalan, for use at the Centre as Director General of
the National Security Guards.
A Ministry communication rejected the State Government's plea
that Mr. Rajagopalan could not be spared since he was holding a
crucial post; instead, the Ministry reminded the State Government
that Mr. Rajagopalan's services were needed for the much more
essential assignment.
This communication has gone to Chennai after a day of feverish
consultations between the Union Home Ministry and the Union Law
Ministry over what the NDA Government could do that would be
reassuring to its ally, DMK in its latest confrontation with the
Jayalalithaa regime in Tamil Nadu.
First, the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee spoke to the
former Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, and wanted to know
about the nature of violence that took place during the DMK rally
in Chennai on Sunday. Sources described it as a courtesy call,
and the Prime Minister reportedly did not say or commit himself
to any Central intervention.
Later, the DMK MPs `met' the Prime Minister in Parliament House
while Mr. Vajpayee was crossing over to the Rajya Sabha. The DMK
MPs told him about the police high- handedness, and one of them
even showed Mr. Vajpayee the bruises he had suffered during the
`police attack' on the rally. All these MPs got was a patient
hearing.
Still later in the evening, a delegation of the DMK MPs called on
the Prime Minister, and this time they were armed with a formal
memorandum, demanding that the Centre fulfil its Constitutional
obligation to provide fundamental rights to citizens in Tamil
Nadu.
In concrete terms, the DMK demanded that a judicial inquiry by a
sitting judge of the Supreme Court to (a) ``go into the police
excesses of sabotaging the basic human rights; (b) to look into
the ill-treatment meted out to Mr. Karunanidhi and his family on
June 30 as well as ``to put an end to the jungle raj'' in Tamil
Nadu;(c) to inquire into the assault on two Union Ministers;(d)
attack on Mr. Vetriselvan, a sitting member of Parliament;(e) as
well as the assault on the mediapersons since June 2001; and,(f)
``suspend with immediate effect the police officials including
the DIG, COP Chennai and other officers who were guilty of high-
handedness on June 29-30''.
However, while there was little the NDA could say in the matter
how a State Government should handle law and order, the Home
Ministry was reportedly ready to send one more communication to
the Tamil Nadu Government, demanding early compliance with its
demand that the services of the three controversial IPS officers.
Law Ministry officials are believed to have already vetted the
proposed demarche, and it is awaiting the final clearance of the
Home Minister, Mr. Advani. The DMK memorandum, itself, notes that
in this connection the Centre could invoke Article 311, along
with Rule 7(1-B) of the All India Services (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1969.
The Centre feels it has a right to demand the services of the
three IPS officers from Tamil Nadu, because even though these
officers have appealed to the Central Administrative Tribunal,
the panel has not issued any notice.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Security blanket over Srinagar Next : Governor reviews situation, to send report | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|