|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Unity on WTO issues
THE COMMON POSITION that the South Asian Association for Regional
Co-operation has decided to take on the issues that will be
deliberated at the Doha ministerial conference of the World Trade
Organisation in November signals to the global community that a
consensus on the agenda for future negotiations cannot be reached
without taking into consideration the views of the countries in
the region. In the face of mounting pressure to agree to the
launch of a new round of trade liberalisation negotiations, SAARC
has made it clear that its members' concerns on imbalances in the
existing WTO agreements should be addressed up front before
widening the agenda for negotiations, as demanded by a number of
countries led by the U.S. and the European Union. The SAARC
communique also emphasises the need to stick for now to the
already mandated negotiations and reviews. The position taken by
SAARC should be a source of encouragement to other developing
countries that a larger united position is possible at the WTO.
The SAARC bloc accounts for less than one per cent of world trade
and there is therefore a tendency to dismiss its position as
being of no real consequence at the WTO. But the influence that
SAARC and the developing countries as a whole do not have by way
of a large share in world trade they make up for in their number
in the consensus-driven WTO. With less than three months to go
for the Doha meeting, the developing countries still hold the
key, for, while most of the advanced economies and a fair number
of South American and East Asian countries have agreed to the
launch of a new round they remain deeply divided about the agenda
for negotiations. Endorsement from the Third World is therefore
crucial for a consensus decision.
Much will ultimately depend on the steadfastness of the Indian
position since it is India which has largely been responsible for
crafting the agenda on ``implementation issues'', around which an
alliance of many developing countries in Asia, Africa and South
America has been built. Any doubts on where India stands should
finally be set at rest by the speech last week of the Prime
Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, in which the Indian
opposition to a new round in the present conditions was
reiterated. This should end the voices from within the Government
which have raised the bogey of isolation at the WTO and expressed
the view that India should give up its opposition and agree to a
compromise agenda that would be more accommodative of U.S.
interests. The Prime Minister has at the same time indicated
flexibility by stating that India has an open mind on all trade
matters but not on non-trade issues such as labour and
environment. This raises the possibility that if there is some
movement forward on the implementation concerns, India could
agree to the launch of a new round provided the agenda is
restricted to additional issues such as industrial tariffs and
trade facilitation. A concrete alternative formulation of this
kind may be necessary in case the bloc of developing countries
now opposed to a new round begins to break up on the eve of the
Doha meeting. A failure to have a contingency plan carries with
it the risk of true isolation at Doha.
In this critical period, turf battles within the Government can
be disastrous since the major trading powers will be able to play
on such divisions. Unfortunately, the past year has seen a tussle
between the Commerce Ministry, the traditional administrative arm
for trade policy, and the Ministry of External Affairs, first
about the appointment of a new Ambassador to the Indian Mission
at the WTO and then about the Indian stand on a new round. Now
that Mr. Vajpayee has publicly made clear the Indian position on
a new WTO round, a position which has been articulated by the
Commerce Ministry, there can no longer be any ambiguity about
where India stands at the WTO.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : No scope for "negotiations" Next : Plotting an economic 'crisis' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|