|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, September 10, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Decision on policy issues getting delayed
By Girish Menon
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SEPT. 9. The delay in the reconstitution of
the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) is costing the
largest constituent of the United Democratic Front (UDF) dear. In
the absence of a party apparatus, the Congress has not been in a
position to take the initiative in framing policies or getting
them cleared by the UDF and implemented by the Government.
As a result, the UDF has been unable to take any decision
relating to major issues. The ruling coalition has not lost any
time to set up a number of sub-committees to evolve its policy
perspectives. These committees include one on liberalisation and
globalisation, liquor, education and sharing of corporation and
boards.
In some cases, the individual constituents have been asked to
discuss the draft reports submitted by these panels to the UDF
High Power Committee (HPC) in their respective party forums. Most
of the coalition partners, especially the smaller ones, have been
prompt in coming out with their views.
Ironically, the Congress, with the largest block in the UDF since
1960s, is without a forum to discuss various policies thereby
lead the coalition from the front.
The UDF has failed to take a decision on disbanding the toddy
workers cooperatives as the Congress has not been able to discuss
the issue threadbare. There is a general feeling among some of
the UDF partners that the views of a few individuals are being
presented in the UDF as that of the Congress.
The UDF sub-committee on liquor submitted its report to the HPC
the other day but the KPCC president, Mr. K. Muraleedharan,
stalled any kind of decision because he wanted a UDF decision on
this crucial issue after the Congress discussed it and presented
its views.
The Congress feels that its views on the liquor policy should be
properly heard, considering the fact that the Congress, along
with several other coalition partners, was recipient of the
support of the Ezhava community, which has a strong presence in
the liquor sector. All the UDF partners are agreed on disbanding
the toddy workers cooperatives but they differ on the alternative
set-up. A few of them want a public sector undertaking to take up
toddy business while some others want the toddy shops to be
auctioned on individual basis.
In the case of sharing corporations and boards, the Congress does
not have control over the matter, with some of the ministers
going ahead with nominating their supporters without waiting for
the UDF to give its seal of approval. Though the controversy over
the appointment of Ms. Padmaja Venugopal as Kerala Tourism
Development Corporation (KTDC) chairperson has taken another
dimension by now, the issue serves well to point out to the
confusion it has created.
The committee on economic liberalisation has hardly done any
concrete work. Though the Congress has a national perspective on
the economic reforms and policies, its leaders' opinions differ
with the national leadership in a few sectors. There are several
leaders like Mr. Vayalar Ravi who have taken consistent views on
the contours of economic policies to be adopted.
Among the senior leaders, the Chief Minister, Mr. A. K. Antony,
does not seem to be in any hurry to see the KPCC reconstitution
as he would like to consolidate his position in the context of
the pre and post-election debate over his leadership. His style
of functioning is different from that of the senior Congress
leader, Mr. K. Karunakaran. His decision making precedes several
rounds of discussions at various levels, including the Government
and the UDF. But the delay in the KPCC revamp has given him some
breathing space.
But Mr. Karunakaran is impatient since the KPCC, dominated by his
men, would help his men to throw the spotlight on the functioning
of the Government, a virtual repeat of what happened in the 1991-
95 period.
Though Mr. Muraleedharan wanted a small and compact KPCC
executive, with fewer office-bearers unlike last time, the
factional logic would prevent his wish from materialising. After
virtually bowing down before the first challenge as KPCC
president in the matter of induction of office-bearers, Mr.
Muraleedharan would have a tough task of taking the party on a
smooth course with a omni bus apparatus.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Centre to blame, alleges Veerabhadrappa Next : Denial of Central aid unjust: Mani | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|