|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, November 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
SC bans smoking in public places
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, NOV. 2. In a significant order concerning the health
of the citizens, the Supreme Court today ordered a ban on smoking
in public places throughout the country with immediate effect.
A Bench comprising Mr. Justice M.B. Shah and Mr. Justice R.P.
Sethi, passing this order on a public interest petition filed by
the Congress leader, Mr. Murli S. Deora, directed the Centre, the
States and the Union Territories to issue orders notifying the
ban.
The public places included government buildings, courts, public
transports, railways, hospitals, community halls, stadia,
educational institutions and public libraries.
The Bench also directed the Commissioners of Police of Delhi,
Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore and Ahmedabad to comply
strictly with the provisions of the Cigarettes (Regulation of
Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1975, relating to the
sale, supply and distribution of cigarettes. They were also asked
to submit status reports of action taken against cigarette
manufacturers violating the advertising code.
The Bench made this order on a suggestion from the petitioner's
counsel, Ms. Indira Jaising, after the Attorney- General, Mr.
Soli Sorabjee, appearing for the Centre, agreed with the
suggestions.
According to the petitioner, despite the 1975 Act being in
force, the implementing authorities had failed to take note of
this and the health of a large number of people was affected
because of misleading advertisements and publicity for smoking
cigarettes.
Ms. Indira Jaising, counsel, during the last hearing had said
statutory warnings should not only be conspicuous but also
indicate that smoking was harmful to health and was likely to
cause heart disease or lung cancer. To this, the court recorded
the statement made on behalf of three leading cigarette
manufacturers that they would voluntarily increase the size of
the warning in advertisements appearing in magazines and
newspapers, handbills/leaflets, within three months, and in wall
paintings in six months. The court asked them to implement the
voluntary offer.
The court also observed that considering the harmful effects of
smoking, the provisions of the 1975 Act were required to be
strictly implemented and complied with by the manufacturers,
suppliers or traders of cigarettes. The petitioner had also
sought a direction from the court for banning the sale of
cigarettes and tobacco products to persons below the age of 18.
The court adjourned the matter for six weeks to get reports from
the Police Commissioners and also to hear other prayers of the
petitioner.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Jaswant-Sattar meet likely in New York Next : Over 70 U.S. soldiers killed: Taliban | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|