|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Blair Govt. in a fix over anti-terror law
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, NOV. 24. The British Government is facing contradictory
pressures in its fight against terror with the hawks pressing for
tougher action against suspected terrorists, and the moderates,
including many within its own ranks, accusing it of using
terrorism as a pretext to assume repressive powers.
The hardliners stepped up their campaign today after The Times
claimed that it had unearthed the ``most damning'' evidence so
far linking three U.K.-based alleged associates of Osama bin
Laden with the 1998 bombings of U.S. Embassies in Tanzania and
Kenya. The men - one Saudi and two Egyptians - are wanted in
America for their alleged involvement in the bombings but because
of Britain's complicated extradition procedure they have managed
to escape deportation. They are beneficiaries of the same law
that allowed the Chilean dictator, Gen. Augusto Pinochet, to
escape extradition to Spain for his alleged crimes against that
country.
In a front-page splash, The Times claimed that the new
``evidence'' showed that Ibrahim Eidarous, Adel Abdelbarry and
Khalid al-Fawwaz were part of Bin Laden's British cell,
masquerading as the London-based Advice and Reformation Committee
(ARC). ``The most damning document is a fax claiming
responsibility for the (1998) atrocities,'' it said alleging that
the fax was sent to Eidarous and Abdelbarry a few hours before
the bombs exploded and bore fingerprints of the two men. The
newspaper reproduced what it claimed was a copy of the fax,
written in Arabic. It also published a resolution ``signed'' by
Bin Laden appointing Khalid al-Fawwaz director of ARC, and argued
that the documents strengthened the case against the three men
whose appeal against extradition is to be decided by the House of
Lords shortly.
The ``revelation'' came amid reports that the Government might
put off its new extradition legislation until the next year and
even when enacted might not apply retrospectively to cover cases
such as those of Eidarous, Abdebarry and Khalid al-Fawwaz. The
Shadow Home Secretary, Mr. Oliver Letwin, insisted that the
proposed legislation be speeded up and made ``retrospective to
cover suspects already being held''. Hardliners accused the
Government of buckling under pressure from its own MPs and
``backtracking'' on its promise to make extradition of suspected
terrorists easier. They quoted the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair
statement after the September 11 outrage declaring that: ``We
cannot have a situation in which it takes years to extradite
people.''
The Home Secretary, Mr. David Blunkett, who is facing flak from
party backbenchers for ``steamrolling'' civil liberties in the
name of fighting terrorism, was today confronted with the
classical dilemma of ``damned if you do, and damned if you
don't'' as he came under pressure to stick to the Government's
original proposals on fast-track extradition. ``If Mr. Blunkett
will not act, Mr. Blair must. Politicians cannot abdicate to
judges decisions that a foreigner's presence `is not conducive to
national interest'. Sanity must return to the extradition law,''
The Times said in a screaming editorial.
Meanwhile, more Labour dissidents joined the rebellion against
the proposal to detain without trial foreign nationals suspected
of terrorist activity. Reports quoted unnamed ``Ministers'' as
saying that the Government was ``over-reaching'' itself, and
assuming powers which had nothing to do with fighting terrorism.
``Chunks of this Bill make me deeply uneasy. They amount to
dramatic extensions of police powers to intrude into the privacy
of individuals and they have nothing to do with the war against
terrorism,'' The Daily Telegraph quoted a Minister as saying.
Thirty-two Labour MPs have already voted against some of the
proposals during the initial reading of the Bill in the Commons
in what has been described as the ``biggest'' backbenchers'
revolt. Mr. Blunkett's bid to buy peace by announcing some
concessions has not satisfied the bulk of the rebels, and more
``bloodletting'' on the issue is expected.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : U.S. drops 'Daisy Cutter' Next : Renegade Philippine Governor held | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|