![]() Friday, Jul 26, 2002 |
| International | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
The UNHCR issued a statement last week advising governments hosting Afghan refugees to offer incentives and assistance to all those who wish to repatriate, and to resume processing the applications of Afghans with pending asylum claims. "By advocating for repatriation, UNHCR is sending the message to governments that conditions in Afghanistan are sufficiently stable for a large-scale return,'' said Rachael Reilly, refugee policy director at Human Rights Watch. "This is misleading and is contradicted by conditions on the ground." Human Rights Watch investigations in recent months have found that conditions inside Afghanistan are still extremely unstable and that risk of persecution exists for certain groups. Continuing factional rivalry between Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum's Junbish forces and Gen. Atta Mohammad's Jamiat troops has created a security vacuum in northern Afghanistan, leading to a rise in attacks on humanitarian aid agencies and Afghan civilians. Armed conflict between the two factions has increased over a wider area of the north in recent weeks, affecting at least four different districts during the week of July 8. At the same time, ethnic Pashtuns, a minority in the north, continue to flee targeted violence, rapes of women and children, seizure of farmland and demands of money by local commanders in Farah and Faryab provinces. Human Rights Watch has also documented ongoing lawlessness and abuses by warlord forces in the south and west of the country. In recent statements, the UNHCR has cautioned governments not to rush repatriation before conditions are stabilised in Afghanistan in direct contrast to its most recent position. On July 2, the UNHCR announced that it was suspending assisted returns from Herat to Faryab and Samangan provinces and to parts of Balkh province in northern Afghanistan, because of continued insecurity. In May 2002, the UNHCR spokesperson in Kabul, Yusuf Hassan, called on governments not to put undue pressure on Afghanistan by prematurely promoting repatriation. "UNHCR has itself admitted that conditions are unsafe in parts of Afghanistan. So why advocate for refugees to return now," said Ms. Reilly. The UNHCR has suggested that if Afghans with pending asylum claims are encouraged to voluntarily repatriate, it would relieve the pressure on asylum systems. But Human Rights Watch said this argument played into the hands of governments such as Australia and the United Kingdom that are already putting pressure on Afghan refugees to return. Australia, for example, has begun making unqualified statements that Afghan refugees, recognised under the Refugee Convention but only given temporary protection visas, will have to go home when those visas expire or may even face cancellation of their visas. The Australian Government is currently offering Afghan detainees 28 days to accept financial incentives to return while threatening that they will have to go back without the money if their asylum claims are rejected. In addition to the security problems facing returnees, many were not in fact returning to their homes but merely becoming internally displaced in urban centres like Kabul and Herat, contributing to the existing strain on infrastructure and resources, Human Rights Watch said. "There are serious doubts about the absorption capacity of Afghanistan and whether humanitarian agencies have the funding and resources to cope with the large-scale returns that UNHCR is promoting," said Ms. Reilly.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|