![]() Monday, Aug 12, 2002 |
| Front Page | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By Neena Vyas
J.M. Lyngdoh
The Chief Election Commissioner, J.M. Lyngdoh, and the Commissioners, T.S. Krishnamurthy and B.B. Tandon, refused to say anything more when contacted by presspersons. After the Gujarat visit by a nine-member team last week and reports of the full Commission's visit in the last two days, it is unlikely that the Commission will immediately announce a poll schedule. The Commission may also like to pay all its attention to the four-phase Jammu and Kashmir elections, scheduled from September 16 to October 8. It now seems that the earliest that elections in Gujarat could take place is after the first week of December, when Id-ul-Fitr is celebrated after a month of fasting by Muslims during Ramadan. After the first week of October, the auspicious `navratras' will be celebrated in Gujarat, leading to Dussehra and then Diwali in early November. The festival of lights will be followed closely by the start of the holy month of Ramadan. Normally, the Commission announces the schedule three weeks before the date of notification to allow time to political parties to prepare for the start of nominations, and the notification itself is about three weeks ahead of polling. With just about eight weeks left for the start of `navratras', the only "window" for elections is the last week of September to the first few days of October. Mr. Lyngdoh's remarks in Gujarat make it highly unlikely that the schedule will be announced almost immediately to enable the elections to take place in the last week of September. They are more likely to be held in the second week of December. The ruling BJP had earlier let it be known that it wanted (and expected) the elections to take place before the `navratras' and in time to enable the newly-elected Assembly to meet by October 10 to prevent a gap of more than six months from its last meeting. The former Law Minister and BJP spokesperson, Arun Jaitely, has said that this was a constitutional requirement, which "must" be fulfilled. However, several eminent lawyers favoured the Opposition view that the six-month requirement is for the same Assembly; it does not apply in this case where the old Assembly stands dissolved and the new one is yet to be elected. The argument is that if the BJP had chosen to dissolve the Assembly in late-September, would the Election Commission be forced to hold the polls within days to meet the so-called "not more than six month gap between Assembly sessions" requirement?
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|