![]() Friday, Sep 13, 2002 |
| International | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
In an extensive interview to The New York Times, Gen. Musharraf was asked if the doctrine of pre-emptive strike would get out of hand with India attacking Pakistan in a fashion the United States might be planning to pre-emptively attack Iraq. ``There is a possibility all right, and there's a possibility that India could take a lead from this theory of pre-emption. And they may undertake an adventurous act. But I would like to hasten to add that here the situation is different. Pakistan is not Iraq and India is not the United States. They'd better not try it,'' Gen. Musharraf replied. He said that while the danger in the subcontinent might have receded, the capability of the forces was very much there and that intentions could change overnight. ``...at the moment, after the escalation, after the troops were moved on the borders by India and we reciprocated, of course, there's an eyeball-to-eyeball contact. The danger lies militarily when two forces have the capability of operations. The intention may have receded at the moment...but the capability of the forces confronting each other is very much there. Intentions can change overnight.''
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|