![]() Saturday, Nov 16, 2002 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Kerala
By Our Special Correspondent
In a joint statement issued here today, they said the facts relating to the kidney sale controversy were pretty clear: renal transplants were done in some private hospitals using kidneys from live unrelated donors, including several Adivasis from Idukki and, shockingly, even from a young woman after terminating her pregnancy. Both the recipient and the donor ought to be patients of equal value to the treating nephrologist and transplant surgeon. It was their primary duty to assess the suitability of the potential kidney donor and to ensure that donation was altruistic and without coercion or financial reward. They also had the basic duty to ensure that the risks to the donor were minimised, the doctors averred. ``Even a suspicion that the organ donation is done for reasons other than altruism is enough for them to reject such a donor. Not only did they not find it disconcerting that hoards of Adivasis from Idukki were suddenly driven by altruism to donate their kidneys to total strangers, but they actively sought the approval of the authorisation committee for the same. A lactating woman was screened as a donor and when she was found to be pregnant, her pregnancy was aborted to pave the way doing the transplant a few weeks later,'' the doctors said. In this context, they noted that the British Transplantation Society considered pregnancy as an absolute contraindication and women in childbearing age as a relative contraindication for being a kidney donor. ``What is really shocking is that even the mildest of criticisms against these grave lapses aired in the original report (of the committee appointed by the IMA to study the issue) is sought to be hushed up by the IMA bigwigs. It seems now that what they really wanted was a whitewash job. The chairman of the inquiry committee showed that he has a mind of his own. And, for that he is now facing disciplinary action (in the IMA)'', Dr. Ekbal and the other signatories to the statement said. They urged the members of the IMA to question the rationale of such conduct by their leadership. "They should insist that the purpose should be to bring out the truth and punish the wrong doers - however powerful they are. This is necessary for the people to retain their faith in doctors, a vast majority of whom is practicing ethical medicine. Let not a small caucus lead the organisation astray," they said.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|