![]() Saturday, Nov 23, 2002 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A five-Judge Constitution Bench, comprising the Chief Justice G.B. Pattanaik, Justice V.N. Khare, Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice Ashok Bhan and Justice S.B. Sinha, while adjourning the hearing asked petitioner Charan Lal Sahu whether he was serious in pursuing the petition. When the petitioner said that he wanted to pursue the matter, the Bench directed listing of the matter before a Bench of which Justice Sinha was not a member. In July, as Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, Justice Sinha had dismissed Mr. Sahu's petition challenging the rejection of his nomination papers for the post of President and seeking postponement of the election. The court held that it was beyond its jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition against a Presidential election and imposed Rs. 20,000 costs on the petitioner. The present appeal is directed against the order.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|