![]() Sunday, Dec 08, 2002 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Neena Vyas
In fact, Mr. Naqvi went a step further, saying that the Gujarat Assembly elections would be a "positive turning point for the Muslims", and not because the BJP was about to lose the election.
A senior BJP leader admitted a day ago that the reason was simple: "in any case, we are not going to get Muslim votes, and sending the two Muslim leaders for the campaign could have meant turning away some of the Hindu voters".
The party has denied the allegation that by saying it was the "only guarantor of the minorities in Gujarat" it was, in fact, indirectly issuing a threat to Muslims to the effect. The message perhaps was: if you do not vote for us, you will not be safe.
Mr. Naqvi alleged that the Congress had been trading in the "Muslim votebank" by making "deals" with the minorities and following a policy of appeasement. This is an old charge by the party, but at no point has it been able to show how the Muslims, who are on an average the poorer and more illiterate segment of society, have been "appeased".
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|