![]() Sunday, Dec 08, 2002 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Sandeep Dikshit
The move to assemble six submarines of French origin has been opposed because it is not only expensive, but also affects the indigenisation drive, the Congress leader, Eduardo Faleiro, said. A high-level delegation, headed by the Defence Secretary, Subir Datta, held talks on the subject in Paris recently and the Chief of Naval Staff, Madhvendra Singh, had earlier this week said a formal nod from the Government was awaited. Mr. Faleiro said the ambitious "30-year submarine building plan'' was intended to beat the "de facto'' submarine technology control regime as well as revive building activity at the Mazagaon docks so that "we become a genuine submarine building nation.'' The proposal was to build 20 submarines for about Rs. 15,000 crores by 2025. The transfer of required technology was obtained from the German design group, HDW. On the basis of this technology and with modifications made by the Indian Navy's submarine design bureau, the indigenous submarine design, Project 75, was finalised in 1997-98. Detailed techno-economic discussions also took place between the Navy and companies such as BHEL and Larsen and Toubro. However, the Defence Ministry has now decided to approach the Cabinet Committee on Security with a proposal to purchase six Scorpene class submarines in semi-knocked down (SKD) or completely knocked down (CKD) forms. The deal may cost about Rs. 12,500 crores, which Mr. Faleiro says is too expensive as compared to earlier plans of making 20 subs for Rs. 15,000 crores. "The Government must disclose the reasons for the Scorpene deal as also inform Parliament as to the status of the indigenous project of submarine building,'' he said. In the second case, the Government has been forced to lease second-hand radars from the U.S. Army as an interim measure because of a delay in the procurement process. The armed forces have thus been deprived of a vital equipment which has increased their vulnerability to Pakistan's fire power. More galling is the fact that the Pakistan Army has possessed similar radars since 1996 whereas the Indian Army has been waiting for years for the equipment, which can accurately pinpoint the location of enemy artillery guns. Had it not been for the Kargil war, the heavy casualties suffered from Pakistani artillery and the persistence of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence, the proposal might well have been shelved. This issue has been mentioned in as many as five parliamentary committee reports. The purchase of this equipment of critical importance was "unnecessarily delayed in various and different kinds of legal hassles.''
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|