![]() Saturday, Mar 15, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Sushma Ramachandran
The visiting EU Trade Commissioner, Pascal Lamy told The Hindu that there were good reasons for seeking to bring the four issues into the Doha Development round of negotiations. In the case of investment and competition specially, the EU felt it would help trade opening benefits to be translated into economics. In the absence of investment or competition legislation, such liberalisation did not translate into FDI or benefit to consumers, he said. The four Singapore issues cover the linkages of trade with investment, competition policy, transparency in government procurement and trade facilitation measures. It was to block the inclusion of these issues onto the Doha Development Agenda that the former Commerce Minister, Murasoli Maran, had insisted on the need for "explicit consensus'' all WTO members at the last ministerial conference. On why the WTO should be the forum to take up such issues, Mr. Lamy said this was because the basic principles of transparency, non-discrimination, national treatment and regulatory mechanism for that were the guiding principles of the WTO. He pointed out that other institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) dealt with the issue of short-term capital flows but FDI did not come into that category and thus needed to be dealt with by the WTO.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|