![]() Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
The court struck down a point system used by the University of Michigan, but did not go as far as opponents of affirmative action had wanted. The court approved a separate programme used at the University of Michigan Law School that gives race less prominence in the admissions decision-making process. The court was divided in both cases. It upheld the Law School programme that sought a ``critical mass'' of minorities by a 5-4 vote, with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor siding with the court's more liberal Justices to decide the case. The court split 6-3 in finding the undergraduate programme unconstitutional. The Chief Justice, William H. Rehnquist, wrote the majority opinion in the undergraduate case, joined by Justices O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer. Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented. Michigan's undergraduate admissions structure is tantamount to a quota, the majority in that case concluded. While it set no fixed target for the number of minority students who should get in, the point-based evaluation system gave minority applicants a 20-point boost. AP
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|