![]() Friday, Mar 12, 2004 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, Here is an alternative to having a "none of the above" option in electronic voting machines. If less than 50 per cent of the electorate turn out for voting in a constituency, it should be assumed that the voters have rejected all the candidates. Fresh elections with a fresh set of candidates could be held in such constituencies.
Col. Ram Gulrajani,
* * * Sir, If the majority chooses the "none of the above" option, will the election be held again with different candidates?
P.V.R. Sarma,
* * * Sir, I believe that most of the people are unaware of the rule that the polling officer is bound to record the voters' unwillingness to accept any of the contestants if such a demand arises. This, however, violates the voters' right to secrecy. The ideal solution is the "none of the above" provision.
P.R.V. Raja,
* * * Sir, Our politicians should undergo a course to learn about the basic tenets of the Constitution, Indian history, `dharma', how to live a disciplined life, and how to think positively like real statesmen. There should be a test at the end of the course and grades given.
Sunil Beniwal,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|