![]() Monday, Mar 22, 2004 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The Supreme Court, while dismissing the public interest litigation challenging the Government's decision to waive the customs duty on Sachin Tendulkar's Ferrari car (March 16), said it had become a fashion to file PILs and warned the petitioner that it would impose costs of Rs. 50,000. Was it necessary to react so sharply to the PIL? It should not be forgotten that his efforts have brought in Rs. 82 lakhs to the Government. Public-spirited people are over-enthusiastic and it is this spirit that has kept our institutions going. Judges like Krishna Iyer encouraged PIL in no uncertain terms.
N.G.R Prasad,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|