|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 02, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Killing fields in Africa
IN a few months in mid-1994, approximately 800,000 people were
killed in the tiny central African republic of Rwanda. The
massacre in Rwanda vividly brought to life the meaning of the
word "decimation", which the dictionary defines as the killing of
every tenth person of the population. The original population of
Rwanda before the killings was roughly seven and a half million
and in a hundred days nearly a million people were dead.
This was the first time the word genocide was used by the United
Nations since it was formed to describe mass killings; so
horrifying was the slaughter in Rwanda. These are just two of the
disturbing bits of information you will find in the most
compelling non-fiction book I have read all year, possibly even
this decade - Philip Gourevitch's We Wish To Inform You That
Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families (Farrar, Straus and
Giroux).
This is a book that must be ranked with Michael Herr's Dispatches
and Ryszard Kapuscinski's The Emperor in its intensity and raw
unflinching coverage of death and murder, and I found it
unsurprising that Robert Stone in his blurb had indeed compared
this book to the two I have just mentioned. It is also
unsurprising that its author has won a bunch of awards including
the Guardian Prize and the National Book Critics Circle Award for
it is rare to read a book that is so disquieting and moving.
Philip Gourevitch went to Africa to bear witness to the most
flagrant example of man's inhumanity to man that the modern world
has ever seen, and his report from the killing fields of Africa
is not for the squeamish.
The extraordinary thing was that while the genocide took place,
the rest of the world watched. The small United Nations peace
keeping force was instructed not to use force except in self-
defence and even for that it was poorly equipped.
To begin at the beginning. The killings were perpetrated by the
Hutu majority against the minority Tutsis and the effort was to
completely eliminate the minority community - over a million
people - an extraordinary undertaking of death and destruction.
The Hutus had always been mistrustful of the Tutsis who traced
their line back to the first ruler - Mwami Kigeri Rwabugiri - to
unify much of present day Rwanda under his rule in the late 19th
Century. In time Rwanda came under German, and then Belgian
colonial rule.
By this time various European "ethnographers" and "explorers" had
begun propounding half-baked dangerous theories about race and
origins and they designated the Tutsis, a master race,
aristocrats who were distinct from the Hutus whom they declared
were of peasant stock. It was another matter altogether that
centuries of inter-marriage, the mixing of bloodlines and the
intricacies of African social and linguistic organisation had
rendered those theories nonsensical, the colonial stereotyping
persisted and permitted opportunists to take advantage of them.
But, until 1959, there was no systematic violence between the
Hutus and the Tutsis. Then, as the Rwandans geared up for
independence, under Belgian supervision, the first major unrest
began and the Belgian in charge who was sympathetic to Hutus,
openly sided with them and replaced all existing Tutsi authority
figures with Hutus. Rwanda became independent in 1962 and
Gregorie Kayibanda was installed as President. He openly spoke of
Rwanda as "two nations in one state" and the seeds of genocide
were sown.
Through the Fifties, Sixties, Seventies and Eighties there were
periodic killings of the Tutsis, aggravated in part by rebel
Tutsi armies staging small skirmishes on the border. But these
attacks ceased very early on when the rebels saw the destruction
that was wreaked upon their community in Rwanda. Despite this,
the killings continued. Further, stacking the deck against the
hapless Rwandan Tutsis was the wholesale slaughter of Hutus in
neighbouring Burundi where a Tutsi regime held power in the
Seventies.
In 1913, President George Habyarimana a Hutu leader who had been
ruling the country for two decades, signed a peace accrued with
the Rwandese Patriotic Front (RPF), a Tutsi rebel army based in
Uganda. It was a meaningless peace, and there were already
signals that an "extermination" was being planned.
Then Habyarimana was assassinated, and his extremist colleagues
began blaming the RPF and the U.N. for his death. The nation's
terrified Tutsis had already heard that lists of Tutsis had been
drawn up by Hutu death squads and those who could began making
preparations to flee. But it was too late. With mindless
ferocity, the government exhorted Hutus to exterminate Tutsis and
Hutus who sympathised with them.
The killers included priests and doctors, teachers and peasants
and, of course, the military and the police. The killings were
largely done with machetes and other country weapons, but it was
methodical and remorseless. At the end of a few months, as said,
800,000 Tutsis lay dead while the world - the U.N., powerful
nations like the United States and the major Western European
powers - either averted their eyes or made polite noises of
concern. The only thing that saved the remaining Tutsis was the
well disciplined Tutsi rebel army lead by General Kagame and the
RPF. They fended off the killers, restored the peace and slowly
began rebuilding the shattered country.
Rwanda will always remain on the world's conscience for this was
a clear-cut case of its turning its back on a catastrophe, one
far worse than Bosnia or any of the other trouble-spots in the
world today.
I wondered about whether Gourevitch's book was the best way to
end the year. And then it occurred to me that there could be no
better way to remind ourselves that if we are to face the future
with hope, then we must never forget what we are capable of; and
in so remembering we must do everything in our power to ensure it
never happens again. As Primo Levi wrote in The Drowned And The
Saved, which is one of the epigraphs to the book, "It happened,
therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have
to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere".
DAVID DAVIDAR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Adoor at the French Cinematheque Next : From Copernicus to Freud: Five books that changed the world | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|