|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
W. Asia talks: 'minor' irritants to the fore
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA (Bahrain) JAN. 4 While media attention has focussed on the
major issues to be discussed by Syria and Israel in the talks
which commenced in Shepherdstown (West Virginia, U.S.) yesterday,
some relatively ``minor'' issues have come to light. Issues such
as the plight of Syrians in Israeli jails, the future of
liberation fighters based in Damascus and the fallout of a
Syrian-Israeli settlement on other regional States have been
relatively overlooked till now. But the resolution of these
problems could be just as important in the search for a permanent
settlement between these two States.
In the Shepherdstown talks, conducted principally between the
Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Ehud Barak and the Syrian Foreign
Minister Mr. Farooq al Sharaa with strong contributions from the
U.S. President, Mr. Bill Clinton and his Secretary of State, Ms.
Madeleine Albright, the focus is on four major aspects. Separate
joint committees are discussing the questions of the border to be
fixed between Israel and Syria, the security guarantees by both
sides, the degree and pace of normalisation between them and
water distribution from the Golan Heights watershed. Before the
talks got underway there was some hope that the two sides would,
at least, be able to finalise a ``Declaration of Principles'' to
cover some or all of these issues. But the word from
Shepherdstown is that hopes should not be raised too high since
the two sides have just begun the excruciating task of taking up
the details.
Even the U.S. administration, which appears desperate to wind up
the different strands of the West Asian negotiations before Mr.
Clinton's term in office ends, is just saying that they believe
there is a historic opportunity for a breakthrough on the Syria-
Israel track. They have also, however, cautioned that this
breakthrough may not occur in the current round of talks even
though they could last for anything up to ten days. There is
already talk of another round in February.
In the region meanwhile, issues which are not prominent in the
Shepherdstown talks are being raked up. Syrian students have
demanded the release of their countrymen jailed by Israel. The
question of their continuance in custody cuts to the heart of the
dispute between the two sides. To the Israelis, many of the
imprisoned Syrians are terrorists, while for their own countrymen
they are people fighting a legitimate war of liberation against
foreign occupation. It is inconceivable that Syria will allow its
nationals to languish in Israeli jails after the conclusion of a
final settlement. Yet, the Israeli Government will also be under
pressure from those who are against the release of prisoners with
``Jewish blood on their hands''.
Israel is likely to demand that Damascus close down organisations
like the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which have
rejected the Oslo processes and are based in Syria. The cynical
view is that the Syrian Government treats these Palestinian
organisations as mere chips in the bargaining with Israel but
there is an ideological and historical affinity between the
Syrian leadership and the DFLP/PFLP. Damascus is unlikely to hand
over the leaders and members of these organisations to Israel.
An attractive alternative is a deal whereby the members and
leaders of the DFLP/PFLP are allowed to return to the Palestinian
territories. The DFLP leader, Mr. Nayef Hawatmeh has already been
given permission to enter the Gaza Strip. But if the members of
these organisations, which Israel accuses of being actively
involved in terrorism, are allowed to settle in territory
controlled by the Palestinian Authority then Israel cannot argue
against the resettlement on these same territories of Palestinian
refugees who may not be involved in any political activity.
Israel's stand is that they will not agree to allow Palestinian
refugees to return even to the PA controlled territory.
If a final settlement is achieved, whatever its shape, Syria
should come to re-posses most of the Golan Heights.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Yeltsin's daughter sacked; Kremlin 'family' still in control Next : Weizman faces graft charge | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|