|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, January 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
The guiding principle
Purpose and strategy will become empty intellectual pursuits,
unless they can be converted into action, transformed into policy
and guidelines for behaviour, which will help people to decide
what to do on a pragmatic and down-to-earth basis. Human beings
are emotional: in order to capture and capitalise on the
emotional energy of a company, the mission needs to furnish a
moral or philosophical platform for behaviour to run alongside
its commercial criterion. This brings us to the next element in
our definition of mission.
Values are the beliefs and moral principles of a company's
culture. It is the foundation on which the company is built.
Values provide the raison d'etre for a company; they provide a
meaning to the norms and behaviour standards in a company. Thus,
we understand that purpose, strategy, behaviour standards, and
values constitute the four components of a mission: a strong
mission will permeate in a company, where these four constituents
flourish and reinforce each other.
A sense of mission is an emotional commitment. Some people feel
and possess this sense of mission: whereas there are others, who
do not feel such an emotional bondage. A sense of mission occurs
when there is a congruence of values between the company and the
employee. For example, if the corporate behaviour standard lays
stress upon cooperation and collaboration; and if an individual
employee by nature is cooperative and helpful, then there will be
a match of values between him and the company.
It is the confluence of values which promote a sense of mission;
it is through values that individuals experience an emotional
identity with the company. Strategy does not necessarily create
compatibility between an employee and the company. There are many
managers who are in intellectual agreement with the company's
purpose and strategy; but that does not per se translate into an
emotional involvement; to that extent the implementation of a
strategic plan will suffer default. It is only when the
individual identifies himself with the framework of values and
behaviour norms in a company, that is when his emotional
commitment comes to pass, it is, then strategy will turn into a
mission.
People are always looking for something more than a mere and
normal existence. The mundanity and humdrum of day-to-day living
does not satisfy them. They constantly seek and strive for a
larger and deeper meaning of life. Values provide them with this
meaning. When an individual works in concert with a group of
people operating with harmonious values in the company, he finds
and feels a sense of fulfilment and satisfaction. The void and
vacuum earlier encountered by him is dissolved. Work becomes a
joy and a pleasure, because it is imbued with a nobility of
purpose; it uplifts him into an exalted state, and gives him
intrinsic happiness.
In this context, it is useful to understand the basic difference
between what is vision, and what is mission, as there is a
tendency to confuse these two concepts. In order to select a
proper course of direction, a business leader must first develop
and formulate a mental image of a viable and desirable future
state of the company. This image is what is known as a vision. A
vision articulates a realistic, credible, and attractive future
for the company; a state which will be far better from the
current business scenario.
A vision and a mission, sometimes, can be one and the same. A
possible and desirable future state of a company may include all
the elements of mission namely, purpose, strategy, behaviour
standards, and values. The differentiating criterion, however, is
that while vision refers to a future state, mission concerns the
current state as well. When a vision is accomplished, it is
replaced by a new vision, because growth and expansion are
mandatory for a company to survive. However, the mission has a
relatively longer span of validity and relevance; quite often it
is timeless and infinite. A vision is more involved with a goal,
whereas a mission is more associated with a way of behaviour.
Today, the business world has become more competitive and market-
driven. Companies which are not clear about their values, and
which have not won the commitment of their employees will find it
difficult to survive, leave alone succeed. A management team
equipped with a mission is likely to outperform such others in
the field who have no mission. As we are asking the managers to
become more conscious and cognisant of the emotional and moral
aspects of their companies, it is imperative to explain how such
attention and action will lead to better performance. The
benefits are derived from two sources: from the clarity of
direction which flows and follows as a consequence, when you
define a mission; secondly, from the collective commitment,
loyalty, and zeal emanating from the individuals who are injected
with the spirit of mission.
The mission team will have value as well as strategic intents to
guide it while taking decisions. When taking strategic decisions,
senior managers are all at sea, as they are mostly dealing with
ambiguous, complex, and uncertain issues, in which no clear right
or wrong is manifest. After taking into account all the available
facts and figures, they are more often inclined to depend on
their personal intuition and judgment.
In such a context, a clear and authentic conceptual framework of
values will be an excellent source to engineer consistent and
uniform decisions. Managers rely more often on their corporate
mission, which defines and delineates their business philosophy,
when taking impromptu decisions. By experiencing the links
between strategy and purpose on the one-hand, and between value
and purpose on the other hand, the managers are more likely to
stay on track and steer on course.
Companies with clear missions are more fastidious about the
people they employ and promote. The parameters of selection
stretch beyond the traditional range comprising education,
experience, skill level, and leadership evidence. What kind of
people will mesh and meet with the culture of the company is a
major criterion.
Companies with strong missions always have strong norms and
behaviour standards. Their employees adhere to such clear and
strict codes of conduct, which ipso facto endow them with an
overall corporate loyalty, rather than departmental affinity.
They find it easier to trust their colleagues, and overcome the
petty and ubiquitous work rivalry and suspicion. Strong shared
values foster a healthy and less cynical view of their peers, and
a deeper regard for the basic objectives of the company. A sense
of mission may not altogether eliminate power games, and personal
idiosyncrasies, but it will certainly defuse and reduce them to a
manageable extent.
A mission statement is the enunciation of a company's avowed
mission. It can help to clarify an issue, or a point of order; it
can serve as a symbol for the common cause shared by the people
in the company; it can, also, help such individuals who are led
astray to be brought back to the right track. A mission statement
is akin to the constitution of a country; it is like the gospel
of a religion. In a company, a mission statement must be seen as
a document sacrosanct and inviolable: it encapsulates the guiding
principles of behaviour and conduct, for its employees to follow.
Creating a mission is an intellectual process, because mission is
an intellectual concept. It deals with the logic which connects
behaviour to purpose. Whereas convincing and converting an
industrial population to accept and adopt the mission is part of
socialisation, and an emotional process. The employees are buying
into a new philosophy of action. It will take time for a mission
to get into the bloodstream of a company. It will take time to
align the behaviour patterns in a company with its values. It
will take further time to align the company's values with the
values of its employees.Converting a company to a new mission is
akin to converting a community to a new religion. It has all the
pains and characteristics of proselytism. It is, therefore,
obvious that such a change will not endure.
In order to create a resonance between strategy and values as
well as propound the behaviour mode in a company, managers need
to continue with the process of thinking, analysis, and
experimentation for a fairly long time. Working with mission
demands devotion and dedication of a high degree. It is in this
passion for mission that we find an opportunity par excellence
for improvement and progress.
R. Devarajan
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : A mission makes all the difference Next : Resetting the stage for the next millennium | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|