|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, January 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Namibian forces in 'hot pursuit'
By M.S. Prabhakara
CAPE TOWN, JAN. 6. The Namibian armed forces have crossed the
northern border into southern Angola in `hot pursuit' of
suspected UNITA rebels operating on both sides of the border.
The armed forces of the two countries, which are bound by a
treaty, have been closely co-operating in the operations against
the UNITA for several months now.
During this period, the UNITA has retreated from much of the
territory it once controlled, including its `strongholds' of
Bailundo, Andulo and, finally, Jamba. It is now believed to have
retreated to areas close to the Namibian border where sections of
the population, having their own problems with the central
government in Windhoek, are known to share cross border kinship
and ethnic links.
The development comes in the wake of the attack by what the
Namibian authorities describe as UNITA bandits' earlier this week
on a touring French family in which three children were killed,
and their parents seriously wounded, near Bagani on the trans-
Caprivi highway, close to the popular tourist destinations of
Popa Falls and the Mahango Game Reserve.
The family was returning to Windhoek on Monday, after celebrating
the millennium weekend in the Caprivi, when they came under
attack by suspected UNITA rebels.
In two separate incidents the following day in the same area, two
other persons were injured. An unidentified UNITA spokesperson
speaking from Geneva has however denied UNITA's involvement in
the attack; and an agency report from Windhoek today quotes
another unidentified `UNITA representative in Namibia' putting
the blame on the Angolan Armed Forces - an astonishing claim
(leaving aside the suggestion that UNITA has a functioning
representative in Namibia) since both the FAA and the Namibian
armed forces have launched joint operations against what they
described as `UNITA bandits'.
The area, which was the scene of an abortive secessionist
uprising last year, borders on three countries - Botswana, Zambia
and Zimbabwe.
According to a news agency report from Windhoek, the UNITA rebels
who are `moving randomly on foot within the area seem to have
taken complete control, despite the presence of both the Namibian
and Angolan troops in the area'. It quoted local game rangers who
have fled from the invading forces as saying that the rebels were
communicating in Lozi, a local language, also spoken across the
border in Zambia. The linguistic map of Zambia does show a small
area bordering Angola as inhabited by speakers of Lozi.
The extension of the war against the UNITA rebels into Namibia is
a logical and indeed an inevitable stage in the ongoing `fight to
the finish' against the UNITA by the Angolan Armed Forces (FAA).
Interestingly, just as the FAA's offensive is yielding results,
voices are again being heard against the `wasteful war' in
Angola.
Most eloquent and dripping with concern for the `victims of the
conflict' are `aid agencies' and other `organs of civil society'
active in all the countries of southern Africa, as well as war
games experts of `security think tanks'.
All these voices were muted, if not utterly silent, during the
decades of civil war imposed on the country by the UNITA, in
particular in the last two years when it actively resumed
fighting, though its leaders had been elected to Parliament and
had been accommodated in government positions at all levels - all
under the provisions of the Lusaka Accord of 1994.
It is only in the last three months when the UNITA has been on
the run, and has lost all its so-called `strongholds' inside
Angola, that these structures, and sections of the media whose
main sources of information are these `organs of civil society'
and `aid agencies' and `security think-tanks' are now expressing
concern over the Angolan conflict becoming a broader sub-
continental conflict. No one, not even those in official
positions in South Africa, can explain how, short of an all out
military assault, the UNITA and its leader, Dr. Jonas Savimbi,
characterised by the leaders of the Southern African Development
Community so recently and with such unanimity as a `war criminal'
after he resumed the civil war, can be defeated.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Delhi may ratify treaty with Dhaka soon Next : Yeltsin feels `like a saint' in Israel | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|