|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, January 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
LDF to discuss creamy layer issue
By C. Gouridasan Nair
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JAN. 6. The State committee of the ruling LDF
is meeting here tomorrow to discuss the implications of the
Supreme Court verdict in the ``creamy layer'' issue and give
finishing touches to the long-pending action plan for the three-
and-a- half-year-old LDF Government. The LDF leadership does not
have much leeway given the character of the Supreme Court verdict
on the creamy layer question. It has only two options: either
seek a review of the Supreme Court decision nullifying the Kerala
State Backward Classes (Reservation of posts in services under
the State), 1995, declaring that there is no ``creamy layer''
among the backward classes in Kerala or constitute a new
committee to go into the criteria for determining the ``creamy
layer''.
Legal experts have already advised the Government against seeking
a review of the apex court's decision and pointed to the danger
of a further negative ruling from the Supreme Court. The
Government, it has been pointed out, could well lose its right to
remain in office if the apex court hands down a judgment
attacking it for its refusal to adhere to the ``law of the
land''. The CPI(M), the only party to oppose the 1995
legislation, is opposed to any review of the verdict. There are
also strong pressures on the LDF from outside against any such
move.
That being the case, the only option before the LDF and the
Government is to appoint a committee which could suggest a more
flexible criteria for determining the size of the ``creamy
layer''. The Government cannot go ahead and fix any criteria on
its own as that would be termed arbitrary. Hence the move to have
a committee on the lines of the Justice K.J. Joseph Committee
constituted by the court. The Joseph Committee had come up with
some stringent norms and these are in force since December 13,
the day the Supreme Court verdict came.
The Supreme Court verdict has occasioned a realisation among
political parties that there is nothing much they can do in the
matter. There is also the belated realisation that the situation
could have been turned at least partially in Kerala's favour if
the previous UDF regime had appointed a committee of its own to
suggest the criteria.
The last meeting of the LDF committee had decided not to rush
into any decision on the Supreme Court verdict and allow
individual constituents to concretise their position before
deciding on any specific course of action. Among the LDF
constituents, the CPI had been vociferous in its endorsement of
the 1995 legislation. It still sticks to its earlier position,
but knows very well that the party cannot go on closing its eyes
to reality.
It has called for a Constitution amendment to ensure that
backward communities did not lose reservation benefits on account
of the creamy layer norm and that the disadvantaged among the
forward communities also received quota benefits. But everybody
knows that a Constitution amendment is out of question, at least
for the time being.
The LDF committee could now be expected to make a formal
recommendation to the State Government to constitute a commission
to go into the issue and suggest fresh criteria for determining
the size of the creamy layer. That is the best it can do under
the given circumstances. The mandate of the new committee would
be to inject some flexibility into the rigid criteria laid down
by the Joseph Committee. As things stand now, families having
more than Rs. 1.50 lakhs as annual income belong to the ``creamy
layer''. The proposal now is to raise that ceiling.
The Government cannot, however, hope to have it raised to
ridiculous levels as had been attempted by the Bihar and Uttar
Pradesh Governments annoying the Supreme Court. Any increase in
ceiling would have to be reasonable and cannot go against the
spirit of the decisions handed down by the Supreme Court in
connected cases. The proposed committee's terms of reference
would be decided taking these factors into account.
The proposal that the Government should have an action plan so
that schemes with short gestation could be taken up before the
LDF Government's tenure came to a close was mooted by the CPI
over a year ago. The LDF committee did obtain specific project
proposals from the independent departments and discuss the issue
at several of its meetings. Some meetings were convened
specifically to discuss and finalise the action plan. However,
there has still been no decision in the matter. Apparently, the
committee itself does not have much faith in the whole proposal.
The growing rift between the CPI(M) and the CPI in Kasaragod
district is a subject which should find a place in the LDF
committee's discussions, but the two Communist parties are
inclined to settle matters through bilateral discussions. The CPI
has launched a campaign against attacks on its cadres in
Kasaragod by their CPI(M) counterparts and the party State
leadership is also quite exercised over the issue. The committee
is certain to take a strong view of the Union Minister of State
for Law, Mr. O. Rajagopal, that Kerala has become a safe haven
for extremists.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Kannada Dept. Employees plan indefinite strike Next : Inamdar issue: BJP flays Maharashtra Govt. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|