|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, January 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Goh's warning on convertibility
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JAN. 19. The visiting Singapore Prime Minister, Mr.
Goh Chok Tong, today cautioned developing countries such as India
against haste in moving towards capital account convertibility,
even while seeking greater liberalisation on foreign investment
flows.
Speaking to a galaxy of corporate leaders, bureaucrats and
diplomats at a function here today, Mr. Goh warned the developing
economies against moving towards capital account convertibility
without a well-developed banking and financial sector. ``Unless
(the) developing countries are fully prepared, they should not
liberalise too quickly on the capital account as they could be
overwhelmed by the sudden withdrawal of short-term funds invested
in the stock markets. Countries without a strong Central Bank and
well-developed system of financial supervisory systems should not
open up quickly as funds can come in and leave very quickly, and
economies can be ruined,'' he said.
At the same time, Mr. Goh pointed out that Singapore was
strengthening its financial sector in the wake of the South Asian
currency crisis and also to meet the onslaught of competition. It
had plans of utilising Indian manpower in a big way, both in
terms of skilled labour for construction activities and technical
personnel in the Information Technology sector. Proposals had
been made to train Indian workmen for construction projects in
Singapore. Another proposal was to educate and train young
Indians who could then return to this country. ``But I hope you
don't mind if some of them stay on in Singapore,'' he added in a
lighter vein.
Responding to a query by the MTNL chairman, Mr. S. Rajagopalan,
about Singapore's lack of interest in the Indian telecom sector,
Mr. Goh said there might be a misguided notion that it was
difficult to operate in this country. Though he was not aware of
the opening up of the telecom sector, he said he would surely
advise investors in Singapore to come here. However, Mr. Goh also
mentioned in this context, Singapore's fruitless efforts to set
up an airline joint venture. India could have adopted an open
skies policy, allowed investments to come in from abroad and then
utilised funds saved for other development projects.
Earlier, delivering the key-note address on ``Globalisation in
the new millennium'' at a meeting organised by the Confederation
of Indian Industry, Mr. Goh warned that the backlash against
globalisation had begun but no economy was strong enough to stop
the tide. Neither was there a viable alternative. As such,
governments would have to strengthen domestic institutions and
equip citizens with skills to cope with the new environment.
Calling upon India's corporate sector to prepare for the changes
following the recent economic reforms, he said the Indian economy
would experience the same pattern of corporate mergers and
internationalisation of business operations which had already
occurred in the developed countries and which was going on in
East Asia. ``I believe that when India liberalises its economy
and plugs itself into the global network, it will fulfill its
vast economic potential,'' he said.
Referring to the failure of the Seattle WTO meeting, he said it
could threaten the survival of the multilateral trading system.
Without an international order to regulate global trade, the
world could fragment into exclusive and protectionist trading
blocs.
It could evolve into a two-tiered system in which developed
economies would be linked by trade and technologies while
excluded developing economies would have to seek refuge in
isolationist policies.
Conceding the substantial differences in the levels of
development between India and Singapore, he said his country's
experience had shown that it was possible to harness the forces
of globalisation for the good of the people. Ultimately,
isolation and protectionism could not be the answer.
The essential requirement was to build the capabilities for the
people to derive the benefits of globalisation.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : UNP backs reforms package Next : BJP panel to meet again today | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|