|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, January 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Iran conservatives losing ground?
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA (BAHRAIN), JAN. 19. In no great political surprise,
Iranian conservatives have struck at pro-reform groups in the
country by rejecting the nominations of a large number of
candidates proposed for the Parliamentary elections in February.
But, as some pro-reform politicians have noted, the conservatives
have in fact not been as vindictive as had been feared. However,
it appears that pragmatism, rather than any newly-found
generosity, led the conservative leadership to collectively stay
its hand.
Last week, the conservative-dominated Council of Guardians, which
is mandated to supervise Iranian elections, sent back a list of
approved candidates to the Interior Ministry, which actually
conducts the election. About 11 per cent of the 6000 plus
candidates who had filed nominations for the 270-member
Parliament were found ineligible to contest the elections. In
rejecting these nominations, the general reason cited by the
Council had been that those disqualified were found to be
insufficiently committed to the Islamic establishment, Islamic
values, and rule by the supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei.
These reasons, however, will no longer be sufficient in these and
the elections to come. Under amendments to Iranian election law,
the Council of Guardians will now have to provide more specific
reasons for its decisions. Many of those rejected by the Council
are expected to appeal against the decision. But the current law
does not detail just how the Council should deal with such
appeals. Legally, then, the Council may get away with its
decisions. Nevertheless, it has admitted that it could have made
some mistakes, and has promised to review some of the decisions.
This could well indicate that the Council has understood that the
current political conditions in Iran have begun to impose their
own set of limitations.
There is little reason to think that the trend of the last two
elections, in which conservatives received less than 30 per cent
of the vote - has been radically reversed. If this trend is
replicated at the February polls, the reform groups aligned with
the President, Mr. Mohammed Khatami, should thus get control of
Parliament. With the executive and legislative bodies under his
control, Mr. Khatami would be in a good position to carry out
drastic reforms of the Iranian political system.
With the conservatives having much to lose, they have tried to
implement several mechanisms to control the voting patterns
themselves. In the last session of the outgoing Parliament, they
tried to pass amendments to the electoral law, whereby Council-
appointed officials would have an authoritative presence in the
polling stations, coterminous with the officials of the Interior
Ministry. However, this attempt proved unsuccessful, and
associations of Iranian bureaucrats are said to have already
declared their allegiance to Mr. Khatami and his associates.
The pro-reform groups have been well-aware that the Guardians
would pose the biggest stumbling block to a successful campaign.
They had prepared for this by filing a glut of nominations, thus
challenging the Guardians to find proper excuses for rejecting
the nominations presented. The dilemma that the Guardians have
faced is that a great many candidates on the pro-reform panels
have impeccable revolutionary credentials. All of these
candidates were also vetted, and in most instances cleared, by
the Interior Ministry itself. In rejecting candidates with
revolutionary credentials, the Guardians were forced to answer
the question as where they drew the line in defining their
commitment to revolutionary principles. Quite naturally, the
Guardians have found that they could not feasibly reject as many
pro-reform candidates as they might have liked.
This setback to the conservatives, even if temporary, reveals the
mass political shift that has occurred in Iran. The pro-reform
mood has infected sections of the clerical establishment,
including some former officers of the Revolutionary Guards. It is
fast becoming increasingly difficult for the conservatives of the
nation to reverse this trend.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : If guilty, Wiranto must quit: Wahid Next : Suicide-bombers stalk Sri Lanka | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|