|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, January 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Fernandes unveils 'limited war' doctrine
By C. Raja Mohan
NEW DELHI, JAN. 24. As military tensions with Pakistan continue
on the Line of Control in Kashmir, the Defence Minister, Mr.
George Fernandes, today unveiled the Government's new doctrine on
fighting ``limited wars'' with Islamabad.
Addressing an international conference on Asian security here,
Mr. Fernandes reassured the international community that India
remains committed to a policy of nuclear restraint even as it
sharpens its ability to resist Pakistan's nuclear blackmail.
While doing its utmost to prevent the escalation of tensions with
Pakistan into a nuclear war, Mr. Fernandes declared that India
had shown during the Kargil crisis that ``its forces can fight
and win a limited war, at a time and place chosen by the
aggressor''.
The Defence Minister was summing up India's post- Kargil security
dilemmas vis-a-vis Pakistan and New Delhi's readiness to fight a
limited conventional war under the nuclear shadow.
After acquiring nuclear weapons, the military leadership in
Pakistan embarked on a course of confrontation with India in the
mistaken belief that the latter would be paralysed from an
effective response because of the nuclear factor, Mr. Fernandes
said.
Reaffirming India's determination to resist such nuclear
blackmail, Mr. Fernandes declared India's readiness to fight any
limited conventional war imposed on it by Pakistan.
Referring to Pakistan's bid to create military tension on the
border and step up cross-border terrorism in Kashmir, Mr.
Fernandes said Pakistan has convinced itself that ``under the
nuclear umbrella, it would be able to take Kashmir without India
being able to punish it in return.''
He added that the belief in Pakistan that ``India would be
deterred in any war imposed on it, and will not fight back'' was
a serious error of judgment.
Pointing to Pakistan's nuclear threat during the Kargil conflict,
the Defence Minister said Islamabad had not understood the ``real
meaning of nuclearisation'' in the sub- continent.
India's own reading of the Kargil war, according to Mr.
Fernandes, is that an atomic arsenal ``can deter only the use of
nuclear weapons, but not all and any war''. He added that under
the nuclear shadow, a ``conventional war remained feasible though
with definite limitations if escalation across the nuclear
threshold was to be avoided''.
Arguing that a conventional war ``has not been made obsolete by
nuclear weapons'', Mr. Fernandes said India ``must possess
conventional capability of a sufficiently high level in order to
lift the nuclear threshold as much as possible''.
Although India's restrained handling of the Kargil crisis was
widely appreciated by the international community, the renewed
tensions between India and Pakistan have revived international
concerns about South Asia as a ``nuclear flashpoint''.
Mr. Fernandes' remarks a few days ago on fighting a limited war
have reinforced these concerns; and there is considerable
skepticism in the West about the ability of India and Pakistan to
contain their conflicts below the nuclear level.
It is in India's interest to elaborate in greater detail, its
compulsions in adopting a strategy to fight a limited war and
commitments to maintain nuclear restraint.
Equally important, India would have to gear itself to deal with
the increased international attention to the Kashmir dispute in
the wake of the talk in the sub-continent about a war, limited or
otherwise.
For Pakistan has calculated that greater the fears of an
impending war in the subcontinent, the more successful it will be
in drawing in the international community to intervene in the
Kashmir dispute.
Musharraf charge rejected
PTI reports:
India today rejected the Pakistani chief executive, Gen. Pervez
Musharraf's allegation that Indian troops had recently crossed
the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir.
Brushing aside Gen. Musharraf's remarks that Indians were not
refraining from crossing the LoC, a Foreign Office spokesman
said, ``it is pointless telling India this. It was Pakistan which
had violated the LoC'' during the Kargil conflict.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : New staff appointed in U.P. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|