|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, January 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
A perverted doctrine
Sir, - Genuine secularism, as distinguished from secular
humanism, signifies piety and cosmopolitanism. This would seem to
be the essence of Mr. V. Sundaram's article, ``A fine blend of
religion and culture (TheHindu, Open Page, Jan. 18)''. It is
indeed a wonderful sermon on uncompromising realism which has
come not a day too soon. But a skewed variety as inflicted on the
masses by Pandit Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi is full of
aridity and disenchantment. At any rate, it is merely anti-Hindu
in practice. Mr. Sundaram has fearlessly excoriated it.
It is worth recollecting the pronouncements of the late Chief
Justice of India, Koka Subba Rao: ``Briefly stated, the Indian
Constitution seeks to rationalise religion, accepts the doctrine
of tolerance and confers the right of freedom of religion on
every citizen, personal and corporate, subject to the laws of
social control. The state is not separated from religion, but is
made the main social instrument for creating conditions for the
sprouting of universal religious spirit in our country. The
constitutional aim is spiritualism, and not atheism, tolerance
and not fanaticism.
``Unfortunately, after independence... secularism has come to
mean atheism instead of spiritual renaissance. Instead of
religion deluging the land with spiritual ideas and unifying the
nation and strengthening the moral fibre, it has helped to divide
the country. The political attempt to implant the quixotic tree
of perverted doctrine of secularism of foreign extraction in the
religious soil of India has not only failed but in the process
has, by weakening religion, deflated the Indian character
(Nijalingappa Endowment Lecture 1970-71, Bangalore University)''.
In fine, let not tendentious politicians through their insidious,
invidious, demagogic and disruptive innovations erode the bedrock
of liberalism and pluralism. Let us switch over to the usage of
the positive term ``cosmopolitanism'' from the negatively-charged
``secularism''.
P. R. Krishna Narayanan,
Kochi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Cut the Gordian knot | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|