|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, January 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Unfinished business
IT WAS that great academician J. P. Naik who called primary
education in India, ``unfinished business''. He was the member
secretary of the Kothari Commission with which I was associated
and JPN invited me to Delhi to help him draft the report. He
honestly believed that without total success in this sphere,
further education may be a farce or tragedy or both. He often
used to cite the example of Rajasthan noted for its valour and
especially the courage of women as portrayed by the life of Rani
Padmini.
Today the picture of Rajasthan is dismal on the women's education
front. Not even 12 per cent of the girls go to school and the
situation is similiar in many other States. Although Kerala and
Tamil Nadu are looking up, all the States put together cannot
touch even 40 per cent. Prof. Amartya Sen, Nobel Laureate, has
gone on record that primary education alone can save a country in
the long run.
But a beginning has been made. For the first time in the history
of education in India, a Department for Primary Education has
been opened in the Ministry of HRD at New Delhi. The Prime
Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, has appointed a secretary for
elementary education in the HRD Ministry. The Prime Minister told
this writer that a new primary education policy for the
Government of India should be launched and as envisaged by the
Union Minister for HRD, Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, a ``Sarva
Shiksha Abhyan'' (SSA) at the district level throughout the
country with an additional funding of Rs. 9,000 crores a year
should be implemented. The Government also intended to amend the
Constitution to make primary education a fundamental right of all
children up to 14 years, he said. An India Education Fund had to
be started so that the public might lend their helping hand to
the Government.
Universalisation of education cannot be a government programme.
The Government may provide the leadership and perhaps the money
but the initiative should come from the public and unless this
becomes a mass movement like the freedom struggle, we cannot win
the battle against illiteracy.
In the developing countries, access to primary education is made
difficult by handicaps of the following nature: (a) climatic and
geographical constraints (b) lack of teachers where they are most
needed (c) lack of communication facilities (d) lack of
facilities such as teaching-learning equipment and materials (e)
inability of parents in the backward socio-economic groups to
send children to full-time schools (f) cultural constraints which
keep girls out of school (g) lack of understanding among the
primary teachers about methods of working with disadvantaged
children and (h) neglect of planning, administration and teacher-
recruitment at the micro-level. Apart from the question of
universal access, three other factors which come in the way of
universalisation are (a) irregular attendance and consequent
failure or dropout (b) dropout because of boredom in school or
socio-economic reasons (c) poor achievement even in the basic
literacy - numerical skills despite fairly regular attendance and
promotion from class to class and (d) a relapse into illiteracy
for want of opportunities to use literacy.
Most of these factors have been discussed since the Report of the
Hartog Committee which found that of the 100 pupils which entered
class I in the beginning of last century, only 18 reached Class
V. Of these, several relapsed into illiteracy, making the money,
time and effort spent on their schooling totally infructuous.
Several measures taken in the past 50 years have helped to expand
the primary education system. They have got bogged down. For
instance, non-formal, part-time education scheme was launched.
Yet, many problems remain and demand attention. Perhaps, a look
at the programmes of China, Vietnam, Bangladesh and Thailand will
help.
A general trend noticeable in the countries mentioned is micro-
planning for universal access and greater devolution of
responsibility and powers to the local levels of administration
and supervision. Alongside, the participation of the community in
educational action is increasingly emphasised.
The basic features of China's primary education programmes since
1950 appear to have been (a) responsiveness to the circumstances
of the learners (b) economies in the cost of provision of
facilities (c) increasing the local pool of trained workers and
peasants for improved local production (d) moral education in the
sense of political orientation and inculcation of nationalism.
While policies were framed at the national level, implementation
was decentralised. Primary education was made neither `free' nor
`compulsory' but `essential' for better production and for
propagating the Government's political ideology.
In the countrywide, MINBAN (people-run) schools gave access to
all the children in a six-year primary-school structure,
appointed local teachers and were financed mostly by co-
operatives. In very poor areas only, state-subsidies were given.
The MINBAN teachers were `functionally' trained but did not
receive formal teacher-training. More than 50 per cent MINBAN
teachers were not formally qualified and were paid not by the
State but by the communes. Agriculture, technical trades and
similar skills required in the rural situation were arranged to
be given to the pupils by the local practitioners. This became a
kind of apprenticeship for the older pupils. Also, work-study
schools were encouraged.
In China, the theory of ``standing on one's own feet'' has been
deeply etched on the minds of the people. Hence the practice of
``Working while learning''. This is reflected in the way
political workers and bureaucrats work together. Such aphorisms
as ``women hold up half the sky'' have helped remove
discrimination against women and cultural impediments in the path
of girls' education.
Vietnam, Bangladesh and Thailand have developed some interesting
practices which are worthy of notice. Vietnam has a network of
night schools for everybody, at all levels. In some, the students
at higher levels teach those at the lower levels. Despite an
extreme shortage of paper and books, Vietnam is doing a
creditable job by adjusting the curricula, learning-time, and the
use of students as teaching resources. In the Mekong Delta where
roads and bridges get washed away and communications break down
during floods, fair-weather schools of short duration operate on
a simplified curriculum and ensure that access to education is
guaranteed. The night-school alternative for all levels is a
workable proposition which most developing countries can emulate,
if local teaching resources are found and utilised.
Some of Bangladesh's alternatives and innovations merit atention.
For instance, decentralised implementation of primary education
for a unit of about 10,000 people. Administration has been
brought closer to the area of operation and a Thana Education
Officer is placed in charge of about 100 primary schools. An
assistant supervises only 20 primary schools and non-formal
primary classes.
But the alternative which seems most significant is the
decentralisation of teacher-training, particularly for non-formal
education. Mobile vans fitted with audio-visual equipment,
particularly video-cassettes, move from area to area to conduct
on-the-spot teacher-training. Production of primary level audio-
visual aids and other materials by secondary teachers and
students is another innovation which can fit into our concept of
socially useful productive work.
From Thailand, two interesting programmes can be adopted. This is
of special interest to those who do not wish to continue formal
schooling: (1) Interest-groups and (2) Reading centres. In the
first scheme, at least 15 learners from a village must come
together to decide what they wish to learn, find a teacher who
can frame the curriculum and teach them within a specified period
- say, five days to three months - and submit the scheme for
sanction to the district education authorities with whom a
flexible budget is available. The teacher's salary is sanctioned
if the curriculum is approved. When the learners certify that the
teacher has satisfactorily completed the set curriculum, his
salary is paid by the authorities.
The reading centres are mostly newspaper reading centres for neo-
literate adults. But an adapted version tried out by the
Institute in connection with its universal primary education and
adult education project has yielded good results. In this
version, the Centre is both a `reading and listening centre' with
additional club-type activities such as dramatics, elocution
competitions, etc.
Suggestions
Some urgent steps to achieve quick results:
(1) Whatever may be the political ideology of a country, the
importance of universal primary education is recognised and new
ventures are organised for goal fulfilment since the existing
system is found inadequate for the purpose.
(2) Adult literacy, broader adult education and universal primary
education are mutually complementary programmes especially when
they have to be implemented in non-formal arrangements.
(3) Traditional concepts of full-time primary education, using
the school as a community centre, etc. are inapplicable in many
situations where education needs to be provided to children and
adults in their spare time and close to their residence.
(4) Non-professional teachers, whether workers, villagers or
students need to be used in large numbers for teaching the
educationally unreached.
(5) New concepts are emerging for training rural teachers on-the-
job.
(6) To be successful, innovative measures in education must
constitute a package.
(7) Action-research has to be part and parcel of any endeavour
for ensuring the functionality of education. The elements of
replicability must, however, be carefully built into the
planning, implementation and evaluation of action-research
projects right from the start.
The Prime Minister has given the green signal. Let us march on
steadily till we reach the goal.
K. VENKATASUBRAMANIAN
Member, Central Planning Commission
PRIMARY EDUCATION
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : God and the human situation Next : Harnessing the child's learning potential | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|