|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, January 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
A step backward, U.S. tells Pak.
WASHINGTON, JAN. 28. The United States has deplored a Pakistani
Government decree that judges take an oath of allegiance to the
provisions of military rule, seen as a step back from promises to
restore civilian rule. The decree has added to the gap between
Washington and Islamabad, which are also at odds over Kashmir
issue, nuclear tests and ties with the Taliban.
``The United States deplores Gen. Musharraf's order,'' said the
State Department spokesman, Mr. James Rubin, on Thursday. ``This
move undermines the integrity and independence of the judiciary
in Pakistan. This is contrary to the path of restoration of
civilian rule the General had pledged to follow when he took
power in October,'' Mr. Rubin added.
Restoring the civilian rule in Pakistan was one of the main
issues which dominated the talks at a meeting between Gen.
Musharraf and a U.S. delegation, led by the Assistant Secretary
of State, Mr. Karl Inderfurth, in Islamabad last week.
Vague threat on terrorism
Mr. Rubin volunteered a vague threat that the Secretary of State,
Ms. Madeleine Albright, might use her power to designate
countries as sponsors of terrorism.
``If the Secretary of State determines that a Government has
repeatedly provided support to terrorism directly, then she would
be prepared to designate that country as a `state sponsor of
terrorism'.
``This step with the judiciary is not a step forward. But because
it's a step backward does not mean that Gen. Musharraf will not
proceed down the path towards civilian democratic rule,'' Mr.
Rubin said.
On the possibility that the U.S. President, Mr. Bill Clinton,
might include Pakistan in his tour of South Asia later this year,
Mr. Rubin said Ms. Albright's recommendation to the White House
would have to balance two elements - reluctance to do business
with the military rulers and the U.S. national interest in
regional stability and in nuclear non-proliferation.
``There will need to be a calculation as to what is the best way
to advance our national interests, by trying to see that the kind
of steps we want taken get taken, or by avoiding Pakistan. That
is the question that the Secretary will wrestle with in the
coming days and weeks,'' he said.
Pak. can influence Taliban
Pakistan's ``considerable influence'' over the Taliban militia
has helped improve human rights for women in Afghanistan, the U.S
Assistant Secretary of State, Mr. Karl Inderfurth, has said.
``When we talk to the Pakistanis - who we believe have
considerable influence on the Taliban - we press the issue of
human rights for Afghan women,'' Mr. Inderfurth told the Council
on Foreign Relations in New York on Thursday.
Meanwhile, media reports here today said Mr. Clinton may skip
Pakistan during his upcoming South Asia visit citing new security
issues in addition to support by some Pakistan Government
agencies to terrorist organisations and Islamabad's links with
the fundamentalist Taliban of Afghanistan. A White House
official, speaking on condition of anonymity, insisted that ``a
visit to Pakistan is still an open question and an announcement
on a visit to South Asia would be made soon'', Washington
Times said.
- Reuter, PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Jethmalani sees no conflict with President Next : Justice must be affordable, says President | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|