|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, January 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
BJP move a threat to democracy: Antony
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JAN. 28. The Congress(I) Working Committee
member and Leader of the Opposition in the State Assembly, Mr. A.
K. Antony, has opposed the BJP moves to tamper with the
Constitution, by stating that the proposal posed a threat to the
existing system of democracy and secularism.
In a statement here today, Mr. Antony said that the Constitution
had drawn lessons from the long-drawn and historic freedom
struggle against the British rule and was framed with a view to
safeguarding the country's sense of freedom, secularism, and
moral values, besides ensuring social justice and all-round
progress.
The pillars of the Constitution was built up by an Assembly
comprising an array of personalities who were in the frontline in
the freedom struggle and who represented various sectors. The
Constitution was framed by such great national figures like
Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Dr. Rajendra
Prasad, Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, who
made their contributions on the strength of their experiences and
in the backdrop of the unique socio-economic situation prevalent
in the country.
Mr. Antony said that the country's democratic structure had been
constructed by taking the best from the written and unwritten
constitutions around the world, to give a fillip to progress in
tune with the Indian situation.
Mr. Antony was prompted to react strongly in reaction to the
current controversy triggered off by the differences of opinion
expressed by the President, Mr. K. R. Narayanan and the Prime
Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee. ``The considered and
sagacious views expressed by the President is a reflection of his
farsighted vision. His opinion that parliamentary democracy is
best suited for the country where economic inequality between
caste and religious communities persisted and where regional and
language contradictions existed should be viewed as a valuable
advice of a experienced statesman''.
The opinion of a person who has served the nation in various
capacities both in India and abroad should be considered with all
the seriousness and sincerity it deserved in view of the
compulsion to safeguard the future of democratic India, he added.
``The country had been able to make considerable progress in the
last 50 years, thanks to the vibrancy of the Constitution. That
nearly 79 amendments were made to the Constitution during these
last five decades is clear evidence that it could encompass the
needs of changing times. We have been able to bring in numerous
legislations like land reforms, abolition of privy purses, bank
nationalisation, abolition of feudalism and the panchayat-raj
system within the framework of the Constitution.
``The Constitution has provisions affording constitutional
protection to the socially backward classes and weaker sections
to bring them into the national mainstream. Therefore, altering
the basic features of the constitution would have far-reaching
implications. The country could not achieve progress to the
extent it desired. The failure to find solution to the people's
problems, including that of unemployment, was not because of the
lapses in the Constitution,'' Mr. Antony said.
He held the political leadership and the bureaucratic system
responsible for their failure to deliver goods during the last 50
years, with successive Governments at the Centre and the State
failing to rise to the people's expectations.
The Congress Working Committee member said that the President's
opinions mirrored national consciousness and the emotion of
Indian citizens. He urged the concerned authorities to fully
encompass the spirit of the President's valuable opinions.
Reckless tinkering with the Constitution would only brook
instability rather than stability, besides opening the path to
tensions and disunity. He wanted the BJP leadership to drop its
ill-conceived moves to rewrite the Constitution.
In a statement, the BJP national council member, Mr. K. Raman
Pillai, denied that either his party or the NDA partners had
initiated moves to rewrite the Constitution. He said here today
that the BJP and the NDA had not proposed an end to parliamentary
democracy and changing the basic features of the Constitution.
The NDA had said in its national agenda that a commission would
be appointed to review the Constitution in the light of the
experiences of the last 50 years. This was reiterated by the
President in his address to a joint session of Parliament, he
added.
He alleged that some people were floating fanciful ideas on the
BJP-NDA account and criticising it besides dragging the
President's name into it. He accused the CPI(M) and the
Congress(I) of carrying on with their motivated and anti-change
campaigns. These parties had converted the Constitution into a
mere document and miserably failed to solve the problems the
country and its people faced. Now they were projecting themselves
as the protectors of the Constitution, Mr. Pillai said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Krishna leaves for Davos Next : TMC to support AIADMK | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|