|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 01, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
All discharged in Jain hawala case
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JAN. 31. The curtain was rung down today on the five-
year- old multicrore Jain hawala case involving the country's top
politicians and bureaucrats.
The Special Judge, Mr. V.B. Gupta, discharged all the seven
accused and thereby disposed of the last case pending before him.
Interestingly, it was the first of a series of chargesheets filed
by the Central Bureau of Investigation that had created upheavals
in the political firmament.
The discharge in the case began with Mr. Justice Mohammed Shamim
of the Delhi High Court, now Chairman of the National Commission
of the Minorities, quashing Mr. Gupta's orders for framing
charges against the Home Minister, Mr. Lal Krishna Advani, and
the senior Congress(I) leader, Mr. V.C. Shukla, and the Jain
brothers.
The High Court had quashed the lower court's orders on the ground
that diaries and loose sheets on their own were not sufficient
evidence to frame charges against the accused as the CBI had
failed to gather corroborative evidence.
Thereafter, the CBI went on an appeal to the Supreme Court but
the apex court refused to interfere with it.
Subsequently began the serial discharge of the accused persons by
the lower court. However, the trial court had found sufficient
evidence to frame charges against the Civil Aviation Minister,
Mr. Sharad Yadav, and the former Lok Sabha Speaker, Mr. Balram
Jakhar. But they too were later discharged by the Delhi High
Court.
Mr. Gupta discharged all the seven accused- the former Neyveli
Lignite Corporation Chairman, Mr. M.P. Narayanan, its former
Executive Director, Mr. N. Venkatesan, the former Deputy General
Manager, Mr. P.R. Desikachari and the former Chief Engineer, Mr.
S. Ranganathan, Mr. N.K. Jain, Mr. J.K. Jain, and Mr. S.C. Gupta.
``Prima facie, there is nothing on record to show that any of the
accused who are public servants have obtained any pecuniary
advantage either for themselves or for someone else,'' the judge
observed in his 132-page order.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Will Clinton skip Pakistan? Next : Cong.(I) to go it alone in Haryana | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|