|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 01, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
Pinochet can go home, rules judge
LONDON, JAN. 31. A British judge today backed the Government's
decision to send the former Chilean dictator, Gen. Augusto
Pinochet, home to Chile on the grounds he is medically unfit to
stand trial on torture charges.
But Belgium, which along with the Amnesty International and other
human rights groups had challenged the British Government, said
it `envisages' an appeal against the ruling.
Judge Maurice Kay rejected an application for a judicial review
of the Home Secretary (Interior Minister), Mr. Jack Straw's
decision to let Gen. Pinochet return to Chile. ``In my judgment,
neither Amnesty International and the other human rights groups
nor Belgium have arguable grounds for judicial review and
accordingly I shall refuse both applications,'' he told the High
Court.
''I do so after careful consideration, conscious that my decision
is unavoidably adverse to, on the one hand, people who have
suffered greatly in Chile's recent history, and, in the case of
Belgium, to a friendly state and its judicial authorities,'' Mr.
Kay said.
Belgium was acting in the case on behalf of Chilean exiles.
``The (Foreign) Minister says he envisages making an appeal,''
said the Belgian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Mr. Michel Malherbe.
''We're disappointed (by the court's decision).''
The judge found that Mr. Straw had acted ``lawfully, fairly and
rationally'' and backed his decision not to disclose the results
of a medical examination carried out on the 84-year- old Pinochet
by British doctors earlier this month.
Mr. Straw had argued that he could not release details of the
medical report because of patient-doctor confidentiality.
The Amnesty said it was considering its legal options and would
decide later on Monday whether to take the case to the three-
judge court of appeal.
``The process remains secret and unfair,'' said Claudio Cordoni
of the Amnesty outside the court. ''Our concerns throughout have
been to keep this process fair and transparent. We think the
involvement by the home secretary to take the matter out of the
courts is a sign of political interference.`` The Home Office had
no immediate comment on the ruling.
Mr. Straw has said that when he makes his final decision on the
case, he will announce it in Parliament. A Home Office spokesman
said no date had been set for this announcement.
- Reuters
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Iraq non-committal on Blix | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|