|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, February 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Clinton trip evokes positive reactions
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, FEB. 2. The first positive reactions to the visit of
the U.S. President, Mr. Bill Clinton, to India have started by
way of press releases and comments; and not surprisingly the
comments have come from some of the key and influential friends
of India on Capitol Hill.
Welcoming the visit, the Ranking Member in the International
Relations Committee of the House of Representatives, Mr. Sam
Gejdenson, has said he is confident that the visit would begin an
era of close cooperation between the two ``great'' democracies
and one that reflected common interests and shared values.
``India and the U.S. must work together on a broad range of
common issues including promoting regional stability, combating
international terrorism and promoting increased trade between our
two countries. It is my hope that President Clinton and Prime
Minister Vajpayee will use this visit to lay the foundation for a
strong and lasting partnership for the 21st Century,'' Mr.
Gejdenson, who recently visited India, said in a statement.
In welcoming the White House announcement, the Democratic
Congressman from New Jersey, Mr. Frank Pallone, has said that Mr.
Clinton's decision to travel to India represented a recognition
of the growing importance of India in both regional and global
affairs and in the vast potential for U.S.-India partnerships in
such areas as trade and investment, security matters, scientific
research and education and cultural exchanges.
Pallone, Ackerman on Pak.
Mr. Pallone, a friend of India on Capitol Hill, has also made the
point that Mr. Clinton should not visit Pakistan. ``I don't think
the President should go to Pakistan. It is important that the
administration continue to send the message to Islamabad that we
are very concerned about Pakistan's role in fomenting instability
in Kashmir, about the links between Pakistan and terrorist
organisations and the crushing of a civilian government by the
military junta now in power,'' the New Jersey lawmaker said.
Applauding the presidential visit to India and opposing the same
to Pakistan, Democratic Congressman, Mr. Gary Ackerman, has said
that Mr. Clinton's visit will give both the U.S. and India a
great opportunity to push bilateral relations on to a different
and higher plane which would allow Washington and New Delhi to
forge a strategic partnership in South Asia.
``I believe that it is time to reexamine our basic premise
regarding U.S. policy in South Asia. We should look beyond the
simplistic prism of India-Pakistan rivalry. We should abandon old
paradigms and Cold war hang-ups and see that India, a robust
democracy, is our natural ally in the region,'' Mr. Ackerman has
said.
The New York lawmaker, who is the Co-Chairman of the
Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans, reaffirmed
his opposition to Mr. Clinton visiting Pakistan unless he had
iron-clad guarantees on at least two key issues: Islamabad taking
verifiable steps to stop the proxy war against India in the State
of Jammu and Kashmir; and the military junta giving a date-
certain schedule to hold democratic elections in which all
political parties and political leaders could participate.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Need for legislative reforms: Gujral Next : Terrorism may have cost Pak. Clinton visit | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|