|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, February 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
U.S. reiterates commitment to be engaged with Pak.
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, FEB. 3. The United States intends to stay engaged
with Pakistan despite the current difficulties it is facing,
according to the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian
Affairs, Mr. Karl F. Inderfurth. Speaking at the Howard
University in Washington D.C., the senior Clinton administration
official remarked that the United States supported a vision of
Pakistan - as presented by its new Foreign Minister - that was a
progressive, modern, democratic, Islamic state.
``This is a vision we can support and Pakistan's potential as an
example of progressive Islamic democracy is one reason for its
importance to us today. But there are other reasons as well,'' he
said.
``Pakistan is important because it is a link - both economic and
political - between the Indian Ocean and Central Asia, because it
has significant human and economic resources and because it has
historically been a friend of the U.S. For all these reasons we
intend to stay engaged with Pakistan despite the current
difficulties it is facing,'' Mr. Inderfurth observed.
The U.S. has an expanding agenda in South Asia, the Mr.
Inderfurth noted, going on to list at least four key items -
democracy, economic reform, social development and integration
into the global mainstream. On Pakistan and democracy the Clinton
administration official hoped that the setback to South Asia by
way of the October 12, 1999 military coup would be temporary.
``Our goal, which Gen. Musharraf says he shares, is to see
Pakistan put back on the democratic path in the shortest possible
timeframe. To the extent that we see evidence that this process
is in motion, it will be in our own interest to see how we can
most appropriately and effectively encourage it,'' Mr. Inderfurth
remarked.
He made the point that in all of the four promising areas listed
above ``the full potential of our growing engagement with South
Asia can be realised only if that region addresses some of the
tough issues... including proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction, terrorism and regional and social conflict.''
This said, Mr. Inderfurth hoped that the time would come soon
when these issues no longer dominated American thinking about
South Asia and instead become deeply engaged in an agenda of
economic growth, science and technology cooperation, cultural and
educational exchange and joint efforts to combat infectious
diseases.
The fact that a senior Clinton administration official has once
again noted that Washington is committed to remaining ``engaged''
with Pakistan should not come as much of a big surprise. This is
what the administration has been saying for a very long time,
especially since the military coup of last October. In fact, it
was Mr. Inderfurth who first commented at the time that the U.S.
cannot ``walk away'' from what was taking place in Pakistan.
In the announcement of the President, Mr. Bill Clinton's visit to
South Asia - India and Bangladesh - there is hardly anything to
indicate at this time that Pakistan is formally off the list. On
the contrary, there is everything to suggest that the
administration here, for a number of reasons domestic and
international, is trying to create an environment that would
facilitate Mr. Clinton at least dropping by Islamabad.
India hailed
PTI reports:
Mr. Inderfurth described India, as ``an emerging economic power
house and world power, a dynamic nation forged from amazing
diversity, and a successful democracy with over a billion
people.''
India, he said, is not only the world's largest democracy but a
very intense, dynamic and, in almost every respect, a successful
one. ``This should make the U.S. and India, as the Indian Prime
Minister, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, noted a year ago, `natural allies';
and indeed it is quite unnatural that our two countries have for
too long seemed at odds on many issues... In large part that was
an unfortunate legacy of the Cold War.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Musharraf planning referendum? Next : Armsdrop case ruling 'shocks' Russians | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|