|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, February 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Arms issue: U.K. in touch with Pretoria
By M. S. Prabhakara
CAPE TOWN, FEB. 3. Mr. Peter Hain, the Minister of State for
African Affairs in the government of Mr. Tony Blair, has passed
on the names and descriptions of three South African citizens
believed to be involved in the supply of arms to the Angolan
rebel movement, UNITA.
Disclosing this in a radio interview on Tuesday, Mr. Hain said
that those engaged in supplying arms to UNITA in defiance of UN
sanctions were in breach of international law, and had to be
stopped. He declined, however, to disclose the names of the three
persons whose names he had passed on to the South African
government.
At a media briefing in Pretoria following talks with Mr. Aziz
Pahad, the Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr. Hain said
that UNITA had a ``very strong network based in South Africa''
which was easy to hide. Elaborating the point, Mr. Hain also said
that the problem with UNITA was that the war in Angola had become
``privatised.'' Private companies and individuals, including
businessmen based in South Africa, had become involved in the
bloodshed. Further, the conflict in Angola had been going on for
a very long time. Many South African supporters of UNITA who had
served in the old intelligence services and military are still
active today, Mr. Hain noted. He added, however that European
``intelligence services'' (of a presumably more egalitarian
variety) were now seeking to stop the war by targeting UNITA.
The interesting thing about Mr. Hain's revelation is not that it
tells anything new, not even that is made by a British government
minister, but rather its direction and emphasis. Perhaps these
considerations should be seen in the context of Mr. Hain's media-
friendly personal background. He grew up in Pretoria until his
parents, who were opposed to apartheid, moved to Britain when
Peter was 16, and he later mobilised British support for boycott
of the all-white South African sporting teams. Also relevant is
his present status as minister under a Prime Minister who
specialises in the feel-good politics of image, public relations,
and slickness.
One may well ask: only three South African citizens involved in
supplying arms to UNITA? Indeed, far more detailed accounts,
including the names of persons thus involved have appeared in the
worldwide and South African media alike over the years. South
African government spokespersons have, in fact, routinely
admitted that private individuals have been involved in such
illegal activities - flying arms and materiel into UNITA- held
areas in Angola - only arguing that the country simply could not
feasibly check and prevent all such illegal flights operating out
of small airports close to the northern border. Indeed, such
explanations have never held much clout with Angolan authorities.
Even the ``privatisation of the security business'' - the common
euphemism used for mercenary activities - is not exactly a new
phenomenon. Indeed, seminars and studies about this phenomenon
conducted and published under the aegis of security think tanks -
some of whose personnel were once part of the apartheid military
establishment - are one of the long-profitable byproducts of this
business.
Mr. Hain conceded Tuesday morning that citizens of other
nationalities, including British nationals, were likely involved
in such illegal activities. The fact is, British involvement in
mercenary activities in Angola, both official and otherwise, goes
back to the earliest days of Angolan independence, when the
notorious Costas Georgiou, a British national of Cypriot origin,
led a multinational group of mercenaries - part of an initiative
by British, American and South African intelligence groups in
support of the anti-MPLA forces in Angola.
Indeed, given the imperialist tendencies of the erstwhile Anglo-
American global hegemon, such interventions continue worldwide.
However, while these were ostensibly intended to contain Soviet
expansionism during the decades of the Cold War and were then for
the most part covert, the powerful merchants of death in the
world now act far more openly, for the cause of advancing the
erstwhile dreams of a global village.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Schuessel-Haider bid to form Govt. Next : Blasts in Manila | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|