|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 06, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
A major deviation, says Cong.(I)
By Angana Parekh
NEW DELHI, FEB. 5. The Congress (I) today deplored the Prime
Minister's justification of the Gujarat Government order and his
statement that since the RSS was a ``social and cultural''
organisation there was nothing wrong in Government servants being
allowed to participate in its activities. To describe in such
terms an organisation whose worker had assassinated Mahatma
Gandhi was ``highly condemnable'', it said.
Mr. Vajpayee's statement marked a ``major deviation'', according
to the AICC spokesman, Mr. Anil Shastri. It seemed that Mr.
Vajpayee had decided to come out from behind the ``mask''of being
a moderate and take the same line as the RSS, VHP and Bajrang Dal
both to maintain his own position in the BJP and to keep his NDA
Government afloat.
The Congress(I) welcomed reports that the President had sought a
clarification from the Centre on the Gujarat order. The
Government should not stand on prestige on this issue and should
immediately rescind the order, Mr. Shastri said. The Congress(I)
had received reports from Gujarat that Government staff who did
not have RSS leanings feared that they would be victimised.
The party also criticised the Union Finance Minister, Mr.
Yashwant Sinha's statement that a harsh Budget was in the offing.
It was incorrect of Mr. Sinha to have made such a statement at
this juncture, when the Budget was being formulated, as it could
lead to hoarding, blackmarketing and artificial price rise. Any
step that was detrimental to the common man and farmers would be
opposed tooth and nail, Mr. Shastri said.
On the Constitution review issue, he said the Vajpayee Government
had brought it up to revive its sagging popularity. The
Government's proposal for a fixed term for the Lok Sabha and
State Assemblies would amount to changing the basic structure of
the Constitution as it would upset the checks and balances
between the legislature and executive. Far from providing
stability, such a move would lead to greater instability and
``there would be a new Prime Minister every two months''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : PM defends Gujarat Govt. order on RSS Next : CVC told to probe major defence deals | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|