|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Review panel by weekend?
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, FEB. 7. The Vajpayee government is likely to announce
the names of the Constitution `review' panel later this week. The
names would be finalised after consultation with the designated
Chairman, Mr. Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah, the former Chief
Justice of India, who is expected to come here this week.
It is learnt that despite strong opposition from the Law
Minister, Mr. Ram Jethmalani, the Prime Minister has approved the
inclusion in the panel of the current Attorney-General, Mr. Soli
Sorabjee. Mr. Vajpayee has already approved the idea of having a
few former attorneys-general in the panel; now, it seems, Mr.
Sorabjee will also be a panel member. Mr. Sorabjee is widely
respected, at home and abroad, as a champion of civil liberties
and judicial independence and integrity.
Another name under consideration seems to be that of Mr. Anil
Diwan, a leading lawyer, who has been appointed amicus curiae in
a number of cases in the Supreme Court. At the same time, there
appears to be some reconsideration about having Dr. Subash
Kashyap, a former secretary-general of the Lok Sabha, as the
member-secretary of the panel; as a constitutional expert, Dr.
Kashyap is considered by many to be a light-weight and as someone
who will not pass the ``Venkatachaliah yardstick''.
The search is on for a `political' name who would invoke no
partisan response. For a while the government toyed with the idea
of including Mr. P.A. Sangma, the former Speaker of the Lok Sabha
and a leading figure in Mr. Sharad Pawar's Nationalist Congress
Party; however, since Mr. Sangma is also the most vociferous
critic of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi's suitability to be the Prime
Minister in this country, the possible hostile reaction from the
Congress(I) to his name has led to a reconsideration.
In his number of public utterances, Justice Venkatachaliah has
already indicated his preference for a non- partisan, broad-based
panel. Given the controversy that the idea of review panel has
evoked, the government is reconciled to having as credible a
commission as possible. Justice Venkatachaliah's argument is
quite acceptable that if the Commission is not to get overwhelmed
with controversy it must have constitutional experts of eminence
and stature.
Interestingly enough the government finds itself subject to
organised pressure on behalf of this or that `expert'. Today the
Prime Minister's Office received a petition in behalf of `those
rooted in the soil of the nation'; translated in plane English,
the plea is to have someone with `rural background'. The petition
is signed by pro-government personalities, among others, like
Professor M.L. Sondhi, recently appointed as chairman of the
Indian Council of Social Science Research, Mr. Sahib Singh Verma,
former chief minister of Delhi, and Mr. Virender Verma, a former
governor of Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. In the next few days
there will be more similar claims and counter-claims.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Five more hostages released | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|