|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
India, U.S. may devise strategy against terrorism
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, FEB. 7. Terrorism will be the topic of discussion
here today and tomorrow between senior officials of the Clinton
administration and India. On a broad scale there is determination
by the United States and India to join forces and fight the
scourge with the two sides apparently working on details on how
this could be effectively done regionally and on a global
fashion. Terrorism or counter- terrorism is expected to be high
during the U.S.President, Mr.Bill Clinton's visit to India next
month.
The meeting between senior officials of the two countries is said
to be unprecedented in the sense that different branches of the
governments are interacting on a comprehensive and serious basis
for the first time. This, the argument here goes, could lead to
greater cooperation on the counter-terrorism front by way of
training and `sharing of experience' including perhaps on the
intelligence front.
On Tuesday the talks between India and the United States take on
a different level. India's Foreign Secretary, Mr.Lalit Mansingh
will be holding formal consultations with very senior members of
the Clinton administration and Cabinet. India's Foreign Secretary
will be meeting the Under Secretary of State for Political
Affairs, Mr.Thomas Pickering;the Deputy Secretary of State, Mr.
Strobe Talbott, will be hosting a lunch.
Mr.Lalit Mansingh will also be having a meeting with the
President's National Security Adviser, Mr. Sandy Berger. Although
the Indian Foreign Secretary's visit has been passed off as
`normal Foreign Office consultations', it assumes special
significance in the light of President Bill Clinton's visit to
India. The last time there had been official Foreign Office-to
Foreign Office consultations was just prior to the nuclear tests
of May 1998.
In a different context, terrorism is high on the agenda between
the United States and Pakistan as well. In the immediate context
the administration has asked for meaningful steps to be taken by
Islamabad on terrorism, democracy and non- proliferation if Mr.
Clinton is to include Pakistan in his South Asia programme. The
Clinton administration wants official Islamabad to rein in the
extremist groups operating in the area as also putting a squeeze
on the Taliban to deliver Osama bin Laden.
For the record the administration here has not formally responded
to the distinctions the top Pakistani General has been making in
the last few days on terrorism and `jehad'. Having said this it
also has to be pointed out that while Washington shares New
Delhi's concerns on the terrorism front on a broad level,it has
not completely signed on to the BJP agenda on this, especially as
it pertained to the role of Pakistan.
For instance the Clinton administration has been very careful in
how it has characterised the brutal hijacking of the Indian
Airlines Flight 814 from Kathmandu and the sordid drama that was
played out for about a week. While Washington may have identified
groups such as the Harkat which has definite pro- Pakistan
leanings and backing as having had a role in the hijacking, the
Clinton administration has made it very clear that there was no
direct evidence of the hand of official Pakistan in the incident.
Terrorism and the steps Gen. Musharraf is willing to take will be
a factor in deciding whether Mr.Clinton drops by Pakistan during
his South Asia trip. But what is being emphasised in many
quarters is that the United States may not wish to jeopardise its
longer term interests in the region by skipping Pakistan. In fact
the Newsweek magazine, quoting official sources,is making the
point that Mr. Clinton may visit Pakistan irrespective of whether
Islamabad meets American concerns on terrorism fearing that a
`snub' might add to the region's instability. This is precisely
what many in Pakistan - generals, politicians, and bureaucrats -
have been saying, and for a long time.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Pak. test fires Hatf-I missile Next : Taliban rules out talks | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|