|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Know your English
``IS IT O.K. to say ``level best''?
(V. D. S. Prasad, Chennai)
Although this expression is used frequently in India, there are
quite a few people who squirm when they hear it being used. They
do their level best (!) to convince others that they shouldn't
say ``level best''; that it's enough to say ``best''. They have a
point. I mean, why say ``level best'', when ``best'' will do? Why
waste your breath on an unnecessary word? A person who
passionately argues that ``level best'' is wrong will be making
the same mistake. He will be wasting his breath. There is nothing
wrong in saying ``level best''. It is included in most
dictionaries. The Oxford English Reference Dictionary (1995) has
the following definition - ``do one's utmost; make all possible
efforts''.
* Our players did their level best to beat Australia.
* Prakash is doing his level best to solve the problem.
* Saritha did her level best to avoid him.
Whether you want to say ``level best'' or ``best'' is up to you.
Use the one that comes to you naturally. Limit the use of ``level
best'' to informal contexts.
What is the difference between ``ache'' and ``pain''?
(Riazuddin, Guntur,A.P.)
Headache, stomachache, bodyache, earache or toothache, are some
of the aches we have all experienced some time or the other. As
the names suggest, the term ``ache'' is normally associated with
some part of one's body. It is usually used to refer to any
discomfort that is localised, which is not temporary, but long
lasting. Most dictionaries define an ``ache'' as continuous, dull
pain. In other words, an ache is not as acute as ``pain''; the
latter tends to be much more severe than ``ache''. ``Pain'' is a
general term; it can refer to discomforts of short or long
duration.
Both words have a figurative meaning as well. They are often used
to refer to mental or spiritual suffering. For example, one can
talk about the ``pain of separation'' and the ``ache of
loneliness''. When your girlfriend or boyfriend ditches you, you
may complain of heartache. Your friends will feel sorry for you
and will try to cheer you up. They will not take your ``ache''
seriously. If, on the other hand, you complain of having chest
``pain'', the same friends will take you very seriously and rush
you to the hospital! My children tell me that I am a pain the
neck and my neighbour thinks I am a headache. Who do you think
dislikes me more?
What is the origin and meaning of the expression ``to take
someone down a peg or two''?
(Tanveer Siddiqui, Mahabubnagar, A.P.)
All of us, at some time or the other, have had the misfortune of
meeting arrogant people. When we run into such people, what is it
that we would like to do? We would like to teach them a lesson in
humility. We would like to show them that they are not as good or
as great as they think they are. When you make these arrogant
people realise they are not as good as they think they are, you
are taking or bringing them down a peg or two. You are cutting
them down to size. Here are a few examples:
* It's about time that we brought that arrogant Sanjay down a peg
or two.
* In Australia, many of our star players were taken down a peg or
two.
* My uncle takes great pleasure in taking everyone down a peg or
two.
The British navy frequently used this expression in the 18th
century. In those days, the importance of a ship was determined
by how high its colours or flags were flying. These flags or
colours were raised or lowered by a system of pegs; the higher
the peg to which the flag was attached, the greater the ship's
honour. So if the flag was tied to the highest peg, it implied
that it was a very important ship. When the flag was placed on a
lower peg, it implied that the honour given to it was not great.
So when you bring or take someone down a peg or two, what you are
actually doing is lowering or reducing the honour or esteem of
that particular individual.
What is the meaning of ``Stockholm syndrome''?
(Nakka Sudhakara Rao, Nizamabad, A.P.)
This expression appeared several times in newspapers during the
hijacking of the Indian Airlines plane in December. Do you watch
a lot of movies? Think of movies where a person is taken hostage
by an individual or a group of individuals. Initially, the
reaction of the hostage towards his/her captors is usually very
negative. He/she tries his/her best to escape. But as the
individual spends more and more time with the captors, he/she
begins to understand them and sometimes even begins to develop a
sense of affection towards them. Sometimes he/she even allies
with the captors rather than the police or the army, which is
trying to rescue them. This feeling of trust and affection that a
hostage develops towards his captors is called ``Stockholm
syndrome''. This was first noted in the case of the people who
were taken hostage during a bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden in
1973.
``When I was kidnapped, my parents snapped into action. They
rented out my room.'' - Woody Allen.
S. UPENDRAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Rampant indiscipline Next : Making music by the beach | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|