|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Next
My journey, my Islam
FAMILIAR with the self absorbed muddles of several NRI attempts
at film making, I was not prepared for the ruthless honesty and
the gripping forcefulness of Kay Rasool's "My Journey, My Islam"
(56 min) at the Mumbai International Film Festival of
documentary, animation and short films (MIFF 2000). Nor did I
expect the antagonism in the questions and comments during the
press meet which followed. "You ran away from India!" was the
refrain which the maker countered by saying, "No, I came back
with my film."
As obvious from the title, the film is a personal quest for
finding one's own space and identity as a woman belonging to a
particular creed, striving to emerge from the mists into light.
What surprises you is the no nonsense mode adopted for the
purpose, travelling through three continents (Asia,Europe,
Australia) and four countries (India, Pakistan, England,
Australia). There is irony here, as also paradox and ambiguity,
which tease us into cogitation.
The journey begins with Kay alias Kausar, with husband and
daughter Zara, at an open air celebration of Eid in Sydney,
Australia. Doubts lurk beneath the festive glow. "Unlike most of
the people here who wave their Islam like a flag, why do I hide
my religion and try to be anonymous? Don't I share their faith?"
A cow sticks its face into the camera and we are in India. Kay's
parents who taught at Aligarh University had wanted their
daughters to be free and self reliant. Watching her mother teach
the rites of prayer to little Zara, Kay recalls her words of long
ago, "Faith is like a cushion behind you."
The mother's descriptions of her marriage and life in Aligarh
establish her piety based on a liberal idealism which believed
that people of differing creeds could co-exist in peace and
friendship. Education was the key, as also tolerance and
compassion. Hers is a religion of love, of equality between man
and man - more importantly - between man and woman. Kausar
herself roamed the marketplace, bare-headed, bindi on forehead,
and with a Hindu classmate, still her best friend.
Cut to Bal Thackeray's demogoguery. The film doesn't need the
Babri Masjid to capture the pulse of 1993. "My family left for
London. I returned to Australia", and changed her nationality.
"India didn't seem to be the place where we could belong."
In Sydney, Kausar is amazed to discover that for many young,
educated Muslim women, the headscarf (hijab) has become an
assertion of feminist identity. "The male cannot view us as an
object but as a person," they tell her. "Of course, vanity and
arrogance have to go. And French perfume." The hijab becomes a
concrete symbol of collective strength - in the home, office and
sports field. It checks sexual harassment and gives empowerment.
(Some of these nouveau acolytes have mothers who do not wear the
hijab, presumably because they still see it as a form of female
subjugation). Kay is troubled as she tries on the scarf at a shop
but discards it. But can she call herself a Muslim without
following all the conventions?
Kay does wear the hijab briefly in her husband's home near
Lahore, Pakistan. "Lower your eyes when you talk to men," her
mother-in-law instructs her, as she tells the servants to avoid
locking eyes with their employers. Even the car windows are
curtained. "Otherwise the poor people of the lower classes will
stare at us in envy," she explains to her grand daughter. To the
old matron, the purdah is the symbol of status, wealth and
security. Patriarchy confirms her domination of the household,
particularly of the younger women in it. Sisters-in-law reveal
ambivalences as they discuss their sequestration in the home and
community.
Kay is more disturbed by the notion of female inferiority
institutionalised by martial law. Was the isolation of women
decreed by the Koran? ("Wasn't the Prophet's wife Khadija a
businesswoman?") Or did dictatorship find it expedient to
perpetuate a chauvinistic, patriarchal, feudal system? At a
women's shelter in Lahore where inmates await legal reparations,
Kay again muses about the travesties of the law which interpret
the Koran selectively, often to the disadvantage of women. ("Is
this the protection Islam promised?") The women's movement in
Pakistan does find voices in protest theatre but not easily or
freely.
Benazir Bhutto, the first woman to head an Islamic State,
explains why she chose to wear the veil upon entering the
political arena. "I come from a family which blanketed its women
from head to foot. My father broke that centuries old rule."
Despite education in the West and progressive ideals, Benazir had
to cover her head in order to make the women feel she was one of
them, as also to reduce the threat men felt at a woman's aspiring
for what was traditionally a man's job.
In London, an encounter with family members throws up other
qualms. Office going women do break religious customs in working
with men associates. A sister betrays confusion and guilt when
she says she will start wearing the veil sometime, though not
just yet. Kay returns with more questions than answers, but gives
her daughter the chance to get acclimatised to her creed by
letting her attend a Muslim school in intermittent spells. After
all, she will have to make her own journey someday to find her
place in the world. "Unlike me, will she want to be a practising
Muslim?"
The well-structured film stands out for its courage. Here the
visual speaks as clearly as the word, often suggesting unexpected
contradictions in what we hear. The self-probe (a soul search
really), does not turn self-indulgent. The metaphor of the veil
gains multiple meanings without shrillness or sloganeering. As
the sequences move smoothly across space and time, the characters
come alive with a rare spontaneity, and express conflicting
points of view. The film maker does not impose her own
perspective to intrude or manipulate. She gives her interviewees
the freedom to be themselves, which is what she wants for
herself, in life and in art.
* * *
The search continues
Excerpts from the interview with Kay Rasool:
WHY did you make this film?
After my marriage, I lived in Pakistan for two years. That is
when I began to have serious questions about how Islam is applied
in Muslim countries to support patriarchy. Nations like Pakistan
and Afghanistan have had incredibly male dominated societies from
ancient times. They interpreted Islam and the Shariat law to suit
their needs. And unlike the secular model adopted in India, they
opted for dictatorship, which continued the suppression of women
and the backward classes.
Islamic law is not codified. So it is difficult for it to work as
a legal system for the State. It can be misinterpreted or
selectively applied at will. Lack of education adds to the
muddles. Can such a system offer freedom for creativity, or
indeed for the individual human spirit?
Seeing the veil as a symbol of suppression, why did you still
wear it in your husband's home?
Because not wearing it would have discredited me at once. Whereas
now, I have gradually found acceptance inspite of being
different. I did work even in Pakistan, in television and
training workshops. I did not allow myself to become an object of
patriarchy. There is such a thing as struggling within the
system, you know.
Your journey does not seem to have resolved your confusions. What
has it brought you?
The events of 1993 made me question whether I had a place in
mainstream India. True, I have not found a place within
mainstream Islam either, because I cannot come to terms
completely with its demands. But my film made me realise that for
me, preserving my individual identity is more important than
finding a collective identity, despite the security it offers. I
would rather stay with the conflicting influences than find a
place in a convention-bound ideology which curtails my freedom.
My film is not just a critique of conventions but an attempt to
transcend them. For me, faith is not the diktats of the State or
society. It is the communion of the individual soul evolving in a
spiritual way through meditation. Islam offers that freedom. My
search continues.
GOWRI RAMNARAYAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Next : Festival of restraint | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|