|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Transition of royalty
ONCE upon a time, India was a land of kings, princes, nawabs and
nobleman. It was not such a long time ago too - 53 years ago. And
then these noblemen became common folk; ordinary citizens.
Nobility may have come and gone but the palaces remain; monuments
that tell their own story, of a period firmly entrenched in
history books, a time when royal India was vibrant and pregnant
with happening. Most rulers played their parts as well as anyone
else as the country passed through a most difficult time in
history.
The concept of a kingdom and the perception of what the king
stands for has not changed over the years, particularly when
viewed in the context of the epics, the Mahabharata and Ramayana.
The king was the servant of the people. By and large, royalty
followed this principle, and where still established is popular
with the masses. Highlighting this aspect and the elements of
luxury, the hallmark of India nobility, is Sharada Dwivedi's
beautifully illustrated offering.
Normally the Indian ruler, as seen by the West, was rolling in
riches - his collection of jewellery and cars often confounding
critics. The adage then was that a king was known by the wealth
he had and India had a number of examples. "The Coveted Jacob
diamond - 62 carats in all and used as a paperweight; the beauty
of the diamond necklace of Maharaja Pratapsingh Gaekwad of Baroda
in which lay the famous 'Star of the South' and 'The Star of
Dresden'; the crystal collection at the Shiv Niwas Palace in
Bikaner - the largest in the world; the 27 Rolls Royces owned by
the Maharaja of Patiala; the dog kennels in Harasar which had
electricity and telephones, and the car collection in Udaipur
used for ceremonial processions".
"The mirage becomes a reality when the writer recreates the
awesome magic and scintillating wonder of a world gone by ... the
stuff that fairy tales are made of ... tales of heroism and
valour, the pulsating excitement of secret liaisons, the dark
intrigues of the zenana, the opulence and sheer beauty of
princely treasures - the world of the Maharajas - a world
immortalised by poets, painters and musicians ... a life away
from common lives that was so near its subjects and yet, so
far ..."
According to Arvind Singh Mewar, who has written the foreword,
"their (the rajas) contribution has never been highlighted or
even acknowledged. Such is the weakness of democracy. However
their role cannot be sidelined for ever. Surely one day soon, the
true facts will emerge and the princes' contribution will find
their rightful place in the annals of history". In particular he
refers to the integration of the States in independent India and
says that "it was a peaceful transfer from monarchy to democracy
and that this would not have been possible without the support of
those who lost the most from it - the rulers of the princely
States".
The government's volte-face (abolition of privy purses,
rescinding the special status guaranteed under the Constitution)
was met with a deal of world-wide criticism and a loss of
integrity for the country but the princes declined to translate
their protest into dangerous resistance; a fact largely
underplayed and "deliberately suppressed". The quiet dignity in
which the ex-rulers accepted the decision was something
admirable. Much of what has been generally projected about the
princes as rulers who squandered public money is far from true.
Some Maharajas perhaps did whittle away the assets of their
States but there were several model States ruled by enlightened
rulers where progress in the field of education, administration
or technology was far superior to British administered India.
These were Baroda, Mysore, Travancore, Hyderabad, Indore, Gwalior
and Bikaner and even smaller ones like Aundh, Sawantwadi and
Gondal where no income tax was levied on the subjects.
The Maharajas ensured that there was bonhomie and harmony between
the various communities. Regardless of the religion followed by
the Maharaja, all festivals - Muslim, Hindu, Christian and others
- were celebrated in a spirit of togetherness. In Hindu ruled
Jaipur, Indore and Gwalior, Id was celebrated with as much gusto
as were Diwali and Holi in Muslim ruled States like Bhopal or
Hyderabad or even smaller ones like Cambay and Palanpur.
Religious tolerance resulted in hardly any communal disturbances
during the Raj. While the rulers were also known to be
extravagant, there were also examples of princes helping the
government. There is a famous example of the contribution by the
Nizam after his State (Hyderabad) had finally became a part of
the Indian Union. The Government found itself in urgent need of
funds and the Nizam agreed to give it a loan. Gold sovereigns and
silver bars were brought from Hyderabad to Bombay by special
train (it filled two railway wagons).
And the rulers did not leave their dependents without money.
Several of them, particularly those of the larger States that had
a larger privy purse, set up trusts for the maintenance of
dependents and employees and for the establishment of
institutions for research, education, healthcare and social
welfare. Prominent among these were the Gangajali Fund of
Gwalior, the Hari-Tara Fund of Jammu and Kashmir, trusts in
Bikaner and Hyderabad and the Mewar Foundation established by the
Maharana of Udaipur.
"Several princes, on the other hand, began selling their assets -
palaces, jewellery, objects of art, furniture, painting or
vintage cards - to channelise these funds into a variety of
businesses. Others with educational qualifications, took up jobs
as managers in industry or joined the diplomatic service. Still
others opted to become politicians. There were also those who
believed in a commitment to preserving the specialised arts and
crafts in their States. And some become hoteliers, successful
ones at that.
Though the era of Maharajas had been consigned to history, it is
still preserved for posterity through the palaces, collections of
art and jewellery and royal hunting grounds now converted to
wildlife sanctuaries or national parks (Periyar, Bharatpur,
Shivpuri, the Gir forests, Ranganthitto, Kutch, Bandipur,
Dachigam and Jadavpur). Zoological gardens in Hyderbad, Baroda,
Junagadh, Mysore, Jaipur, Kotah, Jodhpur, Bikaner and Udaipur
house royalty's private collections of animals and birds.
RAMU SHARMA
The Maharaja And The Princely States Of India, Sharada Dwivedi,
printed at Lustre Press, Roli Books, price not mentioned.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Literature of the Outback Next : Let's throw a party | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|